Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joe Lieberman to retire in 2012
The Washington Post's The Fix ^ | January 18, 2011 | Chris Cillizza

Posted on 01/18/2011 3:07:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman (I) will not seek a fifth term in 2012, according two Democratic sources familiar with the decision.

Lieberman's office did not offer any comment on his plans, saying only that he would make an announcement tomorrow in Stamford, Connecticut. "The Senator's remarks tomorrow will stand on their own," said a Lieberman spokeswoman.

Lieberman will be the second Democratic senator to make public his plans to leave the chamber in the past 24 hours. On Tuesday morning, North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad said he would not seek a a fifth term in 2012.

On the Republican side, Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison announced her retirement last week.

Lieberman's long awaited decision means an end to a political career that took from the 2000 Democratic vice presidential nominee and 2004 Democratic presidential candidate to a speaking role at the 2008 Republican National Convention in support of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

Lieberman's increased alienation from the Democratic party -- primarily over his ardent support for the war in Iraq -- led to his defeat at the hands of cable television executive Ned Lamont in 2006. But, Lieberman formed his own independent party and beat Lamont in a general election to win a fourth term....

(Excerpt) Read more at voices.washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Connecticut; Parties; State and Local; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: connecticut; democrats; israel; joelieberman; lieberman; loserman; mccain; senate; soreloserman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Everyone's reading the tea leaves.
1 posted on 01/18/2011 3:07:05 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hope McCain joins them.


2 posted on 01/18/2011 3:10:45 PM PST by GunsareOK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Finally!


3 posted on 01/18/2011 3:13:51 PM PST by almost done by half
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

4 posted on 01/18/2011 3:16:35 PM PST by mirkwood (Palin-Bolton 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; ...
Just breaking as of about 6pm ET...

This is HUGH and SERIES for those of us living in Connecticut - I didn't expect this, did you, CT FReepers?

Of course Susan Byce-a-WITCH has announced she's throwing her hat in the ring for Connecticut's US Senate seat in 2012 today.

2012 is gonna be an interesting campaign season...

5 posted on 01/18/2011 3:19:50 PM PST by nutmeg (The 111th Congress: Worst. Congress. Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Lieberman has spent years cultivating a moderate image, but his constituents know him as a political chameleon. He's reliable on national defense and foreign policy, but on domestic issues, he's on the side his polling or ambition places him: He was for school vouchers and an avowed enemy of Hollywood sleaze as a senator from flinty Connecticut, but as Al Gore's running mate in 2000, he opposed school choice and went to Hollywood, hat in hand, peddling promises.

PRO-ABORT FANATIC WAS NOT WANTED IN THE REPUB PARTY Lieberman cannot be trusted. During Clinton’s impeachment, this so-called "conscience of the Senate" went on and on condemning Clinton's behavior, but when the crucial vote came, he stood by Clinton. Lieberman is always plotting to get something for himself. He sucked up to McCain at the same time he wrote a huge check to Dems to keep his Dem bona fides.

=========================================

HERE'S HOW LIBERMAN LIED HIMSELF INTO OFFICE Lieberman is a staunch supporter of abortion rights, and even voted against banning partial-birth abortion six times in a row.

But pro-life leaders in Connecticut remember another Joe Lieberman. Lieberman made pro-life pledges about 20 years ago, when he was first a candidate for the US Senate. Lieberman sought pro-life votes in the final stretch of his 1988 Democratic bid to oust 18-year Sen. Lowell Weicker, a pro-abort Republican.

"Joe was very liberal, like Weicker, but we had a poll on abortion that showed which way the wind was blowing," says Daniel Cosgrove, then the Democratic town chairman in Branford, Mr. Lieberman's hometown. The poll showed anti-abortion sentiment outweighed pro-choice views in urban areas throughout Connecticut. "In the Waterbury area, it was more than any, 12,000 [more] against abortion," Mr. Cosgrove says.

Lieberman "expressed himself as coming from a tradition in support of life, not in favor of abortion on demand." "Lieberman expressed himself against abortion, all suicide, and euthanasia. His position on that definitely was well received by the Catholic hierarchy.

State Sen. Regina Smith, who conducted the pro-life poll for the archdiocese, arranged for Lieberman, then the state AG, to meet with Catholic prelates before the election to lay out his support for Catholic pro-life positions.

The strategy worked. Lieberman convinced the archbishop he favored pro-life positions and would vote differently than Mr. Weicker, thus winning Catholic support that pushed him to a narrow 10,000-vote victory — the only Democratic Senate upset of that year. Lieberman's winning margin was less than 1 percent of 1.4 million votes.

Written records of a meeting between Lieberman and top officials of the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) two months after the 1988 election quote Mr. Lieberman as saying he "thinks there are too many abortions," and promising he would not "apply a litmus test" against pro-life judicial nominees.

Liar Lieberman today, of course, denies any of this ever happened.

An Orthodox Jew, Lieberman defends his pro-abortion, pro-infanticide record, saying Jewish law is deeply divided and Orthodox Jewry construes abortion as "a personal matter."

6 posted on 01/18/2011 3:21:54 PM PST by Liz (There's a new definition of bipartisanship in Washington -- it's called "former member.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

So he’s the Democrat Linseed Grahamnesty?


7 posted on 01/18/2011 3:30:19 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (Please donate to FreeRepublic, sanity in a world gone mad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
Lieberman cannot be trusted.

During Clinton’s impeachment, this so-called "conscience of the Senate" went on and on condemning Clinton's behavior, but when the crucial vote came, he stood by Clinton.

Lieberman is always plotting to get something for himself.

Who can forget when Dem Lieberman sucked up to McCain at the same time he wrote a huge check to Dems to keep his bona fides.

The lowest point in US politics was when his (gag) adoring wife referred to Gore's running mate as "My Joey."

8 posted on 01/18/2011 3:32:01 PM PST by Liz (There's a new definition of bipartisanship in Washington -- it's called "former member.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yup. They know RATS will become the minority after the next elections, so they want out.


9 posted on 01/18/2011 3:35:44 PM PST by freespirited (Truth is the new hate speech. -- Pamela Geller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Thanks!


10 posted on 01/18/2011 3:56:47 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mirkwood

LOL! Sarcastic clap.


11 posted on 01/18/2011 3:58:47 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

That be two.


12 posted on 01/18/2011 3:59:13 PM PST by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Lieberman is not an Orthodox Jew and he is lying about Jewish LAw.


13 posted on 01/18/2011 4:37:27 PM PST by rmlew (You want change? Vote for the most conservative electable in your state or district.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; ...

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.
14 posted on 01/18/2011 4:58:33 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rmlew

He got pretty far on a pack of lies.


15 posted on 01/18/2011 7:11:13 PM PST by Liz (There's a new definition of bipartisanship in Washington -- it's called "former member.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

As we’ve seen-——Lieberman will be anything in order to get ahead.

Lindsey is still listed as Repub.


16 posted on 01/18/2011 7:19:41 PM PST by Liz (There's a new definition of bipartisanship in Washington -- it's called "former member.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; campaignPete R-CT; j_tull; kidd; stowaway; jjm2111; Mrs.LoneGOPinCT; underbyte; ...

Big Connecticut Freeper Ping!

Hope you all hop on this and work to elect a real conservative to take Lieberman’s seat!

From your Connecticut raised friend in Florida! :)


17 posted on 01/19/2011 6:22:59 AM PST by seekthetruth (My 2012 Dream Ticket: Jim DeMint / Allen West (Sarah as Press Sec! :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth

I hope we can - but there are a ton of delusional die-hard libs in this state who continue to vote against their own better interests...but we’ll do our best!!


18 posted on 01/19/2011 6:33:05 AM PST by madmominct
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Hopefully you can get a REAL conservative to run, not a RINO.


19 posted on 01/19/2011 6:43:37 AM PST by GailA (2012 rally cry DEMOCRATS and RINOS are BAD for the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Good riddance. I was so tired of hearing how Lieberman is a conservative (Hannity liked to spout this one) and how he'll caucus with Republicans since he was basically thrown out of the Democratic party. B.S.! Besides the war on terror, he's been a reliable progressive/Marxist like the rest of the Dems.

We here in CT blew it in the last election with Dodd's replacement. Well now we have another chance. The CT GOP needs to man up and run a REAL conservative, then get behind and support them. That's what needs to happen, but sadly, I don't have much hope.

20 posted on 01/19/2011 8:02:27 AM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson