[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

It's a comparison anyone is free to make, I just haven't seen anything that warrants it personally. As far as I'm concerned, Reagan was the greatest thinker and communicator since Churchill. I don't see that in Palin. Not now, not twenty years from now.

The post above describes Palin’s argumentation as thin and scattered. I think that description is spot-on. That's my main concern with her. It's also the antithesis of what Reagan was, even in the early days of his political life.

[Windflier]

The post above describes Palin’s argumentation as thin and scattered. I think that description is spot-on. That's my main concern with her. It's also the antithesis of what Reagan was, even in the early days of his political life.

Sorry, friend, but I really think you're selling Palin short. There's a very good reason that you're seeing so much unbridled support for her here, and it's because, like Reagan, she's the real deal. There is simply no one else in the current pantheon of Republican hopefuls who can beat her in a side by side comparison of qualifications for the office of president.

If you haven't already, pick up her book, "Going Rogue" and give it a read. I think you'll be impressed.