Palin helping RNC raise money

CNN's Political Ticker ^ | August 6, 2010 | Peter Hamby, CNN Political Producer

[Clyde5445]

Also this.

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

Sarah Palin says that the governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, has something that Obama lacks: cojones. You have to love this because she’s one of the few Republicans in Washington that has cojones herself, and accusing the president of the United States of not having any. Here is the audio sound bite. It was on Fox News Sunday yesterday, Chris Wallace said, “A federal judge has now blocked the key provisions of the Arizona immigration law. What’s your response?”

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2563471/posts

[rintense]

Why don’t you get a lawyer too?

[Al B.]

The money that Governor Palin raises for the RNC will disproportionately go to RINOs and incumbents rather than up-and-coming challengers.

I wasn't aware the RNC got involved in primary races. I thought that was the purview of the NRSC and the NRCC.

[jla]

Slanderous? LOL As if people are going to be talking around the water cooler Monday morn and saying, "Did you know counterpunch was slandered on that web site?"

Aside: Liz Cheney sitting in for Hannity. How do you like her in this role?
(Question to rintense, as counterpunch is probably having his nappy changed and then given a warm baby bottle of milk)

[rintense]

You certainly have a very interesting 'anti-RINO' history...

So here we have you admitting to supporting Romney in order to ‘stop McCain’, and voting for Rudy as the lesser of two evils:

Duncan Hunter Interview - Dec 8, 2009: On Huckabee, the EPA, GOP Amnesty Hacks, and Harry Reid!!

Thursday, December 10, 2009 7:56:25 PM • 58 of 73
counterpunch to WalterSkinner

No, I was never for Rudy, though I would have voted for him in a heartbeat over 0bama.
The only candidate I was ever enthusiastic about at all was Fred.
Unfortunately, Fred wasn’t.

After that, it was clearly a race for Romney to stop McCain, and I was for stopping McCain.
Charlie Crist pretty much ended that and sealed the McCain nomination — something I have not forgotten, and I hope no one else has either.

But once it became clear that McCain was what we had to live with, I supported him over 0bama.
It was very frustrating watching such an incompetent boob blow every opportunity he had for 3 months straight.

Still, I proudly voted for the guy who wasn’t 0bama.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies

And then there’s calling Duncan Hunter a ‘two-bit pol’ and 'nobody' while touting Thompson (we'll address the 'nobody' later)

Duncan Hunter Interview - Dec 8, 2009: On Huckabee, the EPA, GOP Amnesty Hacks, and Harry Reid!!

Thursday, December 10, 2009 5:34:45 PM • 37 of 73
counterpunch to pissant

It’s pointless for a two-bit pol like Hunter to endorse another two-bit pol like Huckabee in the first place.
When Reagan endorsed Ford, it was to bring the party together after a hard fought campaign. Same for when Romney endorsed McCain. These are cases of the runner-up getting behind his party’s chosen nominee once the race is over.

But when a nobody like Hunter drops out a few weeks into the race to endorse another longshot like Huckleberry, it serves no purpose other than for the drop to stroke his own ego and pretend like his opinion matters.

Unlike Reagan endorsing Ford, Hunter endorsing Huckleberry had nothing to do with helping his party win the Whitehouse. It was just an insignificant politician’s vain attempt at influencing the outcome of an intraparty race.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies

• Duncan Hunter Interview - Dec 8, 2009: On Huckabee, the EPA, GOP Amnesty Hacks, and Harry Reid!!

  Thursday, December 10, 2009 4:38:01 PM • 32 of 73
  counterpunch to pissant

  He should have endorsed Fred Thompson.
  You SWORE at the time he would.
  I called it. I told you Hunter would endorse Huckleberry, because I saw they were two peas in a pod.
  But you said never in a million years would that happen, because you knew your guy.
  So I submit that you are the one who doesn’t know sh*t.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies

Then there’s this lovely post, an adoring photo collage endorsement for Rubio, the man who is against the AZ immigration law:

Republican Govs. blast Baucus bill

Monday, September 28, 2009 9:56:58 PM • 8 of 11
counterpunch to jveritas

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies

Which is kinda funny since you’re SOOO for supporting the Constitution:

WND being dissed on Republican web site over BC controversy

Sunday, September 06, 2009 1:11:01 PM • 45 of 68
counterpunch to mkjessup

You can be however you like out in “real America” but your politicians are all the same no matter where you go.
And they all are all about protecting the power in Washington, not the Constitution.

It’s a little sad that you are so naïve.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies

And this nice little Jeb Bush fawn:

• Election 2010: Florida Republican Primary for Senate Rubio 49%, Crist 37%

  Monday, February 01, 2010 4:09:03 PM • 6 of 17
  counterpunch to MissesBush

  Just wait until Jeb Bush endorses Rubio in the final days before the primary.
  You’ll need cadaver dogs to find Charlie Crist’s support.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  Funny stuff since Rubio is falling behind Crist with each day. Perhaps he should call that bastion of conservatism, Jeb Bush.

  And how about this glowing gem for Newt?

  Whom do Freepers Prefer For president

  Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:48:56 PM • 14 of 249
  counterpunch to OneVike

  This poll is useless without Newt Gingrich included.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  And this one right below it:

  Freep This Poll for Palin!

  Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:50:29 PM • 10 of 23
  counterpunch to DB9

  Go Newt!

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  Or this one?

  Gingrich urges Obama to fire AG Holder

  Friday, August 28, 2009 4:55:04 PM • 32 of 44
  counterpunch to Sub-Driver

  Hopefully Newt will replace President 0.J. in 2012 and fire Holder himself.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  BTW, your boy Newt picked Scozzafava FIRST over Hoffman. Care to explain that?

  But I digress. Here are some more gems:

  A very loving comment about conservative, Jim DeMint:

  DeMint defends Graham on climate

  Friday, March 05, 2010 4:04:42 PM • 37 of 113
  counterpunch to pissant

  Hey, DeMint and Graham belong to the same Country Club.
  Of course DeMint is going to stand up for Graham before he stands up for “regular Americans.”

  All these guys are the same.
  They never learn.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  Yeah, because Newt’s position on global warming is so stellar.

  AS I’ve gone through the history, I’ve noticed an interesting pattern… Newt, Romney and then it hit me. It wasn’t Scozza, it was Scott Brown you were touting! You were in Scott Brown threads more than Pissant in Hunter threads.

  Here’s your lovely prediction:

  Karl Rove: Brown Will Win by 3-6 Points

  Tuesday, January 19, 2010 1:39:07 PM • 3 of 36
  counterpunch to GVnana

  Brown by 10 to 15 points.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  And this:

• Breaking: Scott Brown to be seated in Senate Thursday, 11 Feb!

  Monday, February 01, 2010 4:02:55 PM • 17 of 205
  counterpunch to pabianice

  Seat Senator Brown Now!
   
  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  Which sets this awesome quote up:

  Sarah Palin and John McCain Appearing NOW on Greta on FNC!

  Friday, March 26, 2010 10:15:45 PM · 15 of 600
  counterpunch to rurgan

  I’m not the one campaigning for RINOs.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies

  And then there was some silly post about you saying Scott Brown would take charge of some meeting with Obama, and they'd be listening to Brown. Yeah, how'd that work out? (as for your comment, saw it but couldn't find it once I grabbed all these. Wouldn't want to be called a liar or anything).

  Then I stumbled upon this beautiful post:

  AZ-Sen. 2010: AZ Sen Poll: McCain Opens Primary Lead (over Hayworth) (thanks a lot, Sarah)

  Friday, January 22, 2010 11:45:30 AM • 101 of 380
  counterpunch to rabscuttle385

  I’ve been trying to warn people here about Palin. She’s not what many would like to believe.
  The Palin delusion and projection is the parallel on our side of the 0bama delusion and projection was on the Dems side.

  Palin is not down with our struggle.
  If she was, then she would have never come out for McCain.
  Ridding the GOP of people like McCain is our #1 priority.
  And Palin is an opponent of our top priority.

  Get it through your heads quickly, people.
  Before you allow this woman to lead us even deeper into the wilderness.

  Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies

  But Brown, Newt and Rubio are. Oh, I forget. The one conservative you do like is Pence. But if Pence declares a run for Presidency in the wood, does anyone hear it?

  So what I see here is someone who has a tendency to support big government moderates (aka RINOs), turn around and deny it by slamming conservatives and calling them RINOs.

  You're more all over the place than 15 year old boy losing his virginity.

  But you go on touting 'Pelosi lover, global warming hack' Newt, 'I'm the GOP healthcare savior' Brown, 'I'm the best republican who doesn't like the AZ law' Rubio and Romney as your the lesser of two evils to McCain.

  Sorry for saying you supported Scozza.

[rintense]

Yeah, and no one EVER ‘slanders’ politicians or private citizens on FR.

[rintense]

Down on my kneepads? Another woman says that too me! I called her a harpie witch.

I'd call her a particular word that crossing my lips maybe once every few years (ironically the same thing libs called Palin on a tee).

[rintense]

crossing=crosses.

[jla]

Palin is not down with our struggle.

LOL - Why does that conjure up an image of Archie Bunker's son-in-law?

[onyx]

Well done!!

And this line I want to remember:
“You’re more all over the place than 15 year old boy losing his virginity.” LOLOLOL.

[onyx]

I hear ya!

[counterpunch]

So where was I for Scozzafava?
Where did I ever call Hoffman a liar?
That was the only thing at issue.

It looks like you’ve gone through my entire posting history and the best you’ve got is that I supported Fred Thompson, Rubio over Crist (and still do), Scott Brown over Coakley, prefer Romney to McCain, would vote for Giuliani over 0bama, thought Duncan Hunter had less than a snowball’s chance in hell. And I admire and respect Newt Gingrich’s mind, but not Sarah Palin so much.

So where’s the beef?
I could have told you all that, and saved you the time. Thanks for reading though. That’s why I write.

But the one thing you have failed to do in your wild goose chase is back up your slanderous lies.

[crunk]

But she shouldn't help the RNC.

Yeah, right. You are living in a dream world. These people are politicians not gods. Palin is a politician and she will do what politicians have to do.

[rintense]

Honey, you clearly have comprehension issues.

You slam others for being RINOs (or supporting them) and you turn around and do it yourself.

You're a hypocrite.

And that's NOT a lie or slander.

[rintense]

LOL - Why does that conjure up an image of Archie Bunker's son-in-law?

With his fist in the air!

[counterpunch]

In the race between Scott Brown and Martha Coakley, Brown was the most conservative candidate, just as in the race between Rubio is in his race against Crist. BTW, McPalin endorsed Brown and Rubio. So where’s the beef?

In the race between 0bama and McCain, McCain was the most conservative, but between McCain and Romney, Romney was more conservative, but Fred was more conservative than both. And again, your girl McPalin thought McCain was good enough to run with, and now campaign for and raise money for, even though McCain is NOT the most conservative candidate in his race, currently.

And therein lies the difference.

[Catsrus]

Absolutely! What some on here need is a big dose of common sense. They may be conservatives, but, seem lacking in this area.

[rintense]

In the race between Scott Brown and Martha Coakley, Brown was the most conservative candidate, just as in the race between Rubio is in his race against Crist.

And once again, we have the gullible sucker who falls for the RNC trap all the time. People like you who keep RINOs in business because the RNC knows you'll vote for them. Party over principle!

BTW, McPalin endorsed Brown and Rubio. So where’s the beef?

Is your name Clara because you say Where's the Beef more than the Wendy's lady.

The beef is this: *you're* the one slamming Palin for endorsing RINOs yet you have no problem doing it yourself. The whole 'picking the most conservative candidate' is a convenient lie to hide behind.

And before you bring up beef again, I have stated unequivocally I don't like Palin's endorsement of McCain, but get why. Even Rush and Levin 'get' it. Hell, even JD Hayworth gets it. In point of fact, I haven't liked quite a few of her endorsements. The difference between you and me is, I am under no false illusion that any politician (and yes, including Palin), is perfect nor that they haven't or won't endorse RINOs. And unlike you, I will never vote for the lesser of two evils again.

And let me be explicit here:

Palin/Romney: NO

Palin/McCain: NO

Palin/Huckabee: NO

Palin/Jeb Bush: NO

In the race between 0bama and McCain, McCain was the most conservative, but between McCain and Romney, Romney was more conservative, but Fred was more conservative than both. And again, your girl McPalin thought McCain was good enough to run with, and now campaign for and raise money for, even though McCain is NOT the most conservative candidate in his race, currently.

And once again, we see 'the lesser of two evils' philosophy that keeps the RINOs in office and the RNC laughing at conservatives. As for Palin, reread above.

And therein lies the difference.

Yeah, pretty damn clear difference if you ask me. So take your beef, stick it in your pipe and smoke it.

[jla]

Yeah, pretty damn clear difference if you ask me. So take your beef, stick it in your pipe and smoke it

LOL

You, rintense, are obviously not down with the struggle.

[pissant]

You done good