Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Legal warning to church on gay stance
The Irish Times, Dublin ^ | August 2, 2003 | Liam Reid

Posted on 08/03/2003 3:53:01 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan

Clergy and bishops who distribute the Vatican's latest publication describing homosexual activity as "evil" could face prosecution under incitement to hatred legislation.

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) has warned that the language in the 12-page booklet is so strong it could be interpreted as being in breach of the Act.

Published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, it states that Catholics have a duty to oppose the introduction and operation of legislation recognising same-sex unions. It identifies politicians as having a duty to vote against any such moves.

According to the document, Catholic teaching states that while homosexuals should be treated with "respect, compassion and sensitivity", homosexuality was "objectively disordered".

"Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimisation of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalisation of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil," it states.

It also claims that allowing children to be adopted into same-sex unions would mean "doing violence to these children". This would place them "in an environment that is not conducive to their full human development".

Ms. Aisling Reidy, director of the ICCL, warned yesterday that the statement could be in violation of the 1989 Incitement to Hatred Act. Those convicted under the Act can face jail terms of up to six months.

"The document itself may not violate the Act, but if you were to use the document to say that gays are evil, it is likely to give rise to hatred, which is against the Act," according to Ms Reidy. "The wording is very strong and certainly goes against the spirit of the legislation."

Under the Act literature which is threatening, abusive or insulting, linked with the intent of stirring up hatred, is illegal.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: catholic; catholiclist; gay; hatecrime; homosexual; homosexualagenda; iccl; incitementtohatred; marriage; religiousfreedom; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last
To: ninenot
"Published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, it states that Catholics have a duty to oppose the introduction and operation of legislation recognising same-sex unions. It identifies politicians as having a duty to vote against any such moves."

Enjoy the rest of your tour.

101 posted on 08/25/2003 8:54:01 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez (There's no such thing as a stupid question, there are however, many inquisitive morons out there...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan
According to the document, Catholic teaching states that while homosexuals should be treated with "respect, compassion and sensitivity", homosexuality was "objectively disordered".

What is so hateful about this statement? It's the clear teachings of Jesus Christ and His church. We are to love ALL human beings because they are created in His image, but we do not therefore have to condone or love their wrongful acts.

Pray for homosexuals, that they might find peace and love in the Lord and turn from their harmful practices.

102 posted on 08/26/2003 11:30:00 AM PDT by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan
It's oustounding that this could be happening in once Catholic Ireland.
103 posted on 08/26/2003 11:34:50 AM PDT by BnBlFlag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
It's oustounding that this could be happening in once Catholic Ireland.
To be sure, it's the snakes' revenge ...
104 posted on 08/26/2003 11:42:11 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: narses
Given the voluminous written information about Halperin's "How to be Gay" class -- the course description itself, years of quotes and interviews by Halperin, etc. -- I've never bought into the notion that there's something to be gained by our contacting, interviewing, or trying to dialogue with the man himself. His spin AFTER the national spotlight is on him is of much less interest than what he openly wrote BEFORE when he didn't think anyone was looking. My offer to debate him on the issue in the forum of his choice was published in the Ann Arbor paper, I believe...no response.
105 posted on 09/02/2003 8:05:30 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: AFA-Michigan
My apology. The post above was meant for another discussion. Hit the wrong "reply" button.
106 posted on 09/02/2003 8:08:57 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson