The real reason nobody buys SCO OpenServer or Unixware
1 posted on
07/28/2003 7:12:14 PM PDT by
amigatec
To: rdb3; Nick Danger
Bring on the Penguins.
2 posted on
07/28/2003 7:13:01 PM PDT by
amigatec
(There are no significant bugs in our software... Maybe you're not using it properly.- Bill Gates)
To: amigatec
Whew. I can't wait for the Microsoft shills to show up (I won't name any names, but his initials are GOLDEN EAGLE). Then this thread will
really take on a life of its own.
;)
FYI: I'd have to say that Slackware Linux works the best overall. And I've worked with Solaris 1.1 through 9 (SPARC and Intel editions after 2.6), the *BSD distros, and everything from Debian through Red Hat.
Of course, I'm preferential to the hardened OS's such as Immunix, Bastille Linux and OpenBSD. Trusted Solaris was hard to warm up to, though...
-Jay
3 posted on
07/28/2003 7:28:59 PM PDT by
Jay D. Dyson
(Leftists are like any other lower life form...they devour their own when it suits their purpose.)
To: amigatec
My team administers 812 different sites, and we are standardizing around AIX 5L on all of our database and file servers, and SuSE Linux on our internet interfaces. I have around 70 sites still stuck with Unisys boxes running Open Unix 8, but not for too much longer, thank goodness.
7 posted on
07/28/2003 9:58:01 PM PDT by
SoDak
To: amigatec
Some years back the Novell salesmen were in my boss' office and we were discussing Netware performance. They showed us some impressive statistics on how many Netware clients the new server we were going to get could support. After grilling them on the hot seat for a while it came out in discussion that the server software was not Netware 4 but UnixWare. *cough*
12 posted on
07/29/2003 2:16:28 PM PDT by
Liberal Classic
(Quemadmoeum gladis nemeinum occidit, occidentis telum est.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson