Skip to comments.
ACLU asks federal judge to dismiss case against man-boy sex group
freedom forum ^
| 7.18.03
| The Associated Press
Posted on 07/20/2003 9:45:33 AM PDT by freepatriot32
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Lion in Winter
"Wasn't some white supremist group sued by a group of blacks because the blacks felt that the group instigated racial violence and hatred. The group of blacks won a money judgement, I believe."I don't recall, but it's quite possible.
There seems to be a rash of "Unequal Protection" cases proliferating the judiciary that hinge on which way the political winds are blowing.
21
posted on
07/20/2003 10:51:58 AM PDT
by
F16Fighter
(Ann Coulter for Attorney General... Joe Scarborough for VP...Tom Tancredo as Homeland Security Chief)
To: Lion in Winter
Would you be meaning that guy Dees and his Southern Law Center (or something like it)? They sued the Klan and the Metzgers for something similar and won huge monetary judgements.
22
posted on
07/20/2003 11:16:10 AM PDT
by
thegreatbeast
(Quid lucrum istic mihi est?)
To: freepatriot32
Now we know why the ACLU hates the Boy Scouts so much. The Scouts have standards for what is and what is not considered acceptable; and they are high standards that all are demanded to meet or they are either gone or cannot come in!
23
posted on
07/20/2003 11:19:05 AM PDT
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: freepatriot32; All
I truly believe that GLSEN is closely associated with this bunch of perverts, considering their zeal in spreading degeneracy in elementary schools! GLSEN should be investigated at the Federal level from top to bottom.
24
posted on
07/20/2003 11:28:53 AM PDT
by
JoJo Gunn
(Help control the Leftist population. Have them spayed or neutered....)
To: thegreatbeast
Seems like they could be convicted on the basis of conspiracy. Kind of like mafioso.
25
posted on
07/20/2003 11:32:45 AM PDT
by
breakem
To: Rodney King
Easy:
Jaynes is the link to NAMBLA that the lawyers are saying makes the organization liable.
Sicari was just a sicko along for the ride.
They're two different people, after all.
26
posted on
07/20/2003 11:41:40 AM PDT
by
TheAngryClam
(Bill Simon's recall campaign slogan- "If I can't have it, no one can!")
To: Mamzelle
ditto
27
posted on
07/20/2003 11:43:21 AM PDT
by
GailA
(Millington Rally for America after action http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/872519/posts)
To: TheAngryClam
Woops. I misread the whole thing. Thanks.
28
posted on
07/20/2003 11:45:03 AM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: Rodney King
Sure.
29
posted on
07/20/2003 11:45:43 AM PDT
by
TheAngryClam
(Bill Simon's recall campaign slogan- "If I can't have it, no one can!")
To: freepatriot32
Like the hapless and delusional Bob Barr, I once believed that ACLU was a necessary shield for Constitutional rights, even when this required unpopular stands.
I first came into conflict with the organization over their dogmatic policy of attacking relatively minor, and often personal, examples of religious symbolism. I was agnostic at the time, but I did not see that such things as a Nativity Scene or a Ten Commandments plaque represented a threat. Rather, they were symbols of our collective cultural heritage and their exclusion would represent a kind of censorship: the attempt to prohibit this kind of expression seemed to be the greater threat.
I realized that the ACLU's perception of a threat was based on a fundamental component of the left/liberal worldview: that every action and word associated with government and its employees should carry the weight of law. They were interpreting these displays in terms of what the displays would mean if THEY were running things.
This is true of the Pledge of Allegiance as well. "Under God" is officially "endorsed" according to ACLU and therefore carries the weight of authority by virtue of emanating from an official source. This is projection, nothing more. Liberals want this kind of authority to apply to their own pronouncements, and assume that it does, so they must project it onto the actions of others. Remember this when you hear about LL indoctrination in, say, multi-culturalism or Kennedy/Roosevelt hagiography.
30
posted on
07/20/2003 12:03:57 PM PDT
by
atomic conspiracy
( Anti-war movement: road-kill on the highway to freedom.)
To: freepatriot32
INTREP
To: CatoRenasci
i first heard of nambla from Revenge of the nerds.
32
posted on
07/20/2003 12:18:00 PM PDT
by
scott91
To: freepatriot32; I_Love_My_Husband; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; ...
Thanks for the post. Thanks for the ping.
33
posted on
07/20/2003 12:20:00 PM PDT
by
scripter
(Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle.)
To: scripter; freepatriot32; I_Love_My_Husband; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda
You should know Jeff Curley was actually murdered, sodomized, and his body dumped. In that order.
A couple years back, Frisoli also produced a "rape and escape" manual, (on the FNC show, The O'Reilly Factor) which is made available from NAMBLA, via its website.
Regardless of what the ACLU says, free speech does not mean you can give people instructions on how to commit crimes. Paladin Press knows this, as does Mike Diana.
34
posted on
07/20/2003 12:57:16 PM PDT
by
Houmatt
("Best that we can do is alert people there to LP and the truth that FR has fallen."--TLBSHOW)
To: freepatriot32
"We contend that the First Amendment was intended to apply exactly to organizations like this. If we can't protect their rights, then the rights of other organizations are all at risk," said John Reinstein, legal director of the Massachusetts ACLU chapter.I haven't read the comments yet. I am seriously enraged. The ACLU is if anything worse than NAMBLA. They are fiends and those of right mind have to fight them with every weapon at our disposal.
Here is a website dedicated to fighting this evil: www.defendthefamily.com. I don't have much money to donate (I will help FR next time! I promise!) But I just donated to Defend the Family. They are a pro-family anti-homosexual agenda legal organization affiliated with Scott Lively (author of "The Pink Swastika"). In case any reading this don't know of that book, you should read it. The entire text is online at www.abidingtruth.com.
To: freepatriot32
Pedophilia as a civil right? Gee, maybe someone ought to go after the ACLU.
36
posted on
07/20/2003 1:32:30 PM PDT
by
Cachelot
(~ In waters near you ~)
To: freepatriot32; american colleen; maryz; OLD REGGIE
What do you read in the Boston papers about this currently?
I remember reading about it when it happened and being appalled and sick. It seemed to me that it was so dark, ugly,horrific and sinister and I expected to read a lot more about it.Little follow up out here by the local paper and didn't see anything in Time or Newsweek either.
Do any of you recall the reaction of the people in Boston at the time? How about the newspaper?
To: joesnuffy
If the ACLU wants to keep Church and State separate, I say we fight to keep ACLU and Perverts separate.
38
posted on
07/20/2003 3:04:28 PM PDT
by
Wondervixen
(Ask for her by name--Accept no substitutes!)
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Bill O'Reilly brought this case up in his show and sided with the parents of the boy and was disgusted with the ACLU. I hope they lose and this will be the start of the destruction of this organization, esp. if others follow their lead and sue this organization if any material of theirs (NAMBLA) is found in the vile rapists' possession. Through the courts is the way to destroy them--they have no "freedom of speech" to incite the rape and murder of boys and it is time for the courts to hold them responsible for their ideas that they diseminate to the predators of little boys.
39
posted on
07/20/2003 3:22:47 PM PDT
by
savagesusie
(Ann Coulter rules!)
To: Radix
So should the ACLU
40
posted on
07/20/2003 3:38:11 PM PDT
by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson