To: RAT Patrol
It is irrelevant whether he is for or against the state law. Clarence Thomas is against it; he thinks it's "silly."
6 posted on
06/26/2003 6:27:26 PM PDT by
sinkspur
To: sinkspur
Excuse me. He is a member of the dissenters, sink. What he thinks of the law is irrelevant to his decision. That's what he is saying. IOW, it should be overturned in Texas, but it's not a constitutional matter.
7 posted on
06/26/2003 6:30:24 PM PDT by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: sinkspur
Clarence Thomas is against it; he thinks it's "silly." Silly or wise, for or against.
Not: Constitution or Un-Constitutional.
Proof positive that there's a new despot in town.
Bow down before your new RULERS. The Supremes will brook no dissent from Amendments, Legislatures, or the people.
31 posted on
06/26/2003 7:07:28 PM PDT by
Uncle Miltie
(Racism is the codified policy of the USA .... - The Supremes)
To: sinkspur
Clarence Thomas is against it; he thinks it's "silly." He also understands that the role of the Court isn't to legislate from the bench.
252 posted on
06/27/2003 12:35:38 AM PDT by
Roscoe
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson