Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Fat tax' to fight obesity
News.com.au (Australia) ^ | June 9, 2003 | Rachel Morris

Posted on 06/08/2003 2:24:14 PM PDT by SamAdams76

BISCUITS, cakes and processed meals could be loaded with a "fat tax" as part of a shock tactic to combat Australia's spiralling obesity epidemic.

High-fat foods could be subject to the plan, which the Australian Medical Association says may be the way to reduce weight and ultimately save the health system billions.

The AMA will ask the Federal Government to consider the tax as part of an overall strategy to combat obesity. Recent studies have shown 47 per cent of women and 63 per of men are overweight or obese.

Diabetes Australia has also backed discussion of the plan at a federal level amid estimates more than one million Australians are afflicted by diabetes and that by 2010, 70 per cent of the population will be above their healthy weight range.

The British Medical Association has endorsed a similar plan to impose a 17.5 per cent value-added-tax on fatty food, except for takeaway meals which are already taxed. A similar tax has successfully been introduced on unsaturated fat products in Sri Lanka.

AMA vice president Mekesh Haikerwal said the doctors' group would be happy to put the tax idea "on the table" for discussion with the Federal Government.

A tax on fatty food would help to create a healthier society but "shock tactics" were needed to arrest the spread of obesity, he said.

"The discussion needs to be had," Dr Haikerwal said. "There needs to be a giant wake-up call, obesity is a major drain on our resources, on our health systems and workplaces."

Australian health ministers will meet next month to consider a national strategy to battle obesity levels with new evidence showing that within the next decade four-out-of-10 children will be overweight.

Diabetes Australia spokesman Alan Barclay said the plan was "definitely worth considering for the battle against diabetes". But he warned forcing companies to rethink the fat content of their products could result in foods high in sugar and starch.

There is already evidence some companies are changing the ingredients in snack foods. The recipe for Mars bars has been changed amid health fears over a fatty ingredient.

Hydrogenated vegetable fat has been removed from the popular chocolate bar because of its links with high cholesterol levels and heart disease.

"It needs to be targeted," Mr Barclay said. "Not all fats are bad for you."

He said there were about 600,000 registered diabetics in Australia with an estimated one million more undiagnosed or with pre-diabetes symptoms.

Diabetics spent an average of $10,000 a year on their condition, he said, with those with complications spending $20,000.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: pufflist; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last
To: mewzilla
Let'em tax. If you don't eat the stuff, or much of it, what's the problem?

I thought conservatives were anti-tax.

101 posted on 06/09/2003 5:28:12 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Once you stop testing yourself, you get slow. When that happens they kill you" - Young Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
BTW - To all you Jackbooted Public Health Fascists out there, I'll make this real clear.

BAN IT, or SHUT THE HELL UP. No 1/2 tax BS.

102 posted on 06/09/2003 5:31:49 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Once you stop testing yourself, you get slow. When that happens they kill you" - Young Guns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
My own personal nutrition advice is never to eat on an empty stomach. Dangerous as all git out.

That said, this is one of the more blatant examples of social engineering through taxation. These schemes seldom work for several reasons: (1) the government is more addicted to money than Rosie is to Twinkies, and tends to spend it in places other than to address the issue at hand; (2) people modify their behavior to avoid the tax before they modify their behavior to address the problem; (3) attempting to suppress a product in demand by taxing it engenders black markets; (4) taxes, even when they are mistakenly assessed or no longer necessary, are seldom or never lifted; and (5) people like me who aren't fat and don't smoke still get pissed off when some self-righteous jackass on a power trip decides he or she knows better how to live than we do.

We could, of course, vote them out of office...only...notice how seldom this stuff is called for by elected representatives? It's usually self-proclaimed "experts" and high-minded social reformers who have enthusiasm for their chosen obsessions but absolutely no accountability for their results. "Our intentions were sound" is the pathetic bleating of a fool caught out. Usually they just change the subject.

103 posted on 06/09/2003 5:50:03 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
My own personal nutrition advice is never to eat on an empty stomach. Dangerous as all git out.

So if your stomach ever gets empty, you starve to death?

104 posted on 06/09/2003 9:31:02 PM PDT by supercat (TAG--you're it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76; *Wod_list; jmc813
The opening salvo in the War On Fat.
105 posted on 06/10/2003 6:27:54 AM PDT by MrLeRoy (The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; Bill D. Berger; ..
WOD Ping
106 posted on 06/10/2003 6:42:10 AM PDT by jmc813 (After two years of FReeping, I've finally created a profile page. Check it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
This is absolutely absurd. First of all, scienctist can't accurately determine WHICH foods are best for you. Is it fatty foods, or too much carbs?

Secondly, maybe some of us who are in decent shape LIKE a big mac every once in a while. Thirdly, you cannot always tell how good shape people are in by their weight. Obviously 400 lb. porkers aren't in good shape, but some people can have a small gut and be in better shape than a flat stomached weakling.

Do we really need such socialism?
107 posted on 06/10/2003 6:59:56 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
"Let'em tax. If you don't eat the stuff, or much of it, what's the problem?"

Hopefully, you will remember that attitude when they begin taxing something that affects you.

108 posted on 06/10/2003 7:05:35 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FL_engineer
My dad has lost like like 60 pounds on Atkins. Much healthier now. He was at 350 and he plans to go to 250.
109 posted on 06/10/2003 7:10:52 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
your problem, not mine.

I am getting sick of supporting other peoples problems, I have enough trouble helping my family with their problems let alone people I probably wouldn't like if I knew them.

110 posted on 06/10/2003 7:11:02 AM PDT by Little Bill (No Rats, A.N.S.W.E.R (WWP) is a commie front!!!!,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I don't beleave in the Gov taxing me for someone elses problem. If you are fat, you are old, you are poor, and you are sick that is your problem, not mine.

I am getting sick of supporting other peoples problems, I have enough trouble helping my family with their problems let alone people I probably wouldn't like if I knew them.

111 posted on 06/10/2003 7:12:02 AM PDT by Little Bill (No Rats, A.N.S.W.E.R (WWP) is a commie front!!!!,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
Sorry for the double, screwed up double at that.
112 posted on 06/10/2003 7:13:01 AM PDT by Little Bill (No Rats, A.N.S.W.E.R (WWP) is a commie front!!!!,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Yes, it's always an attempt to solve the problem by taking more money away from us. If death is not a deterrent, why would higher costs be? They'll just switch to cheaper food that may be every bit as bad. They already charge more money for health foods, so where's the solution? Higher cost for health food and higher cost for fatty food, when do you start taxing the air I breath?
113 posted on 06/10/2003 7:13:42 AM PDT by man of Yosemite ("When a man decides to do something everyday, that's about when he stops doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Turbo
Where's my Victory coffee?
114 posted on 06/10/2003 7:29:03 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: supercat
Good heavens no - you coat the delicate stomach lining with beer before shocking it with food. Works for me...
115 posted on 06/10/2003 1:36:06 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
Where's my Victory coffee?

You can actually get some and send some more to our troops: Victory Coffee

I'm sure this company means well, but whoever runs it probably didn't read 1984 in high school.

116 posted on 06/10/2003 5:36:54 PM PDT by Mark Turbo (The saga continues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Comment #117 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson