Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArGee
I'm not going to continue quibbling with you ArGee. You're determined to make baseless accusations and find fault with everything I say.

By saying I should work for the AP you insinuate that my answer to John O was what? I told him I've never advocated special homosexual rights and that's the truth. I've said so explicitly to you on more than one occasion. I inserted the word special for clarity since it seemed 'special rights' was what he was implying with the quote marks around the word homosexual.

Quit being so captious. It's damn annoying and makes you look petulant.

Why should anyone stop fighting to ensure marriage remains between a man and a woman?

How are you harmed if two people of the same sex want to call themselves married? How are you specifically harmed?

Why schools[sic] be forced to teach that "it's OK to be gay?"

Are schools being forced to teach that or is that the will of the teachers and the teachers unions?

And, for heaven's sake, why should we allow the mentally ill to dominate our politics?

Well, apart from the fact that there are a bunch of mentally ill people already running the government, in which case there would be no change, gays aren't mentally ill. You saying it repeatedly doesn't make it so.

337 posted on 06/11/2003 12:23:42 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: tdadams
I'm not going to continue quibbling with you ArGee. You're determined to make baseless accusations and find fault with everything I say.

That's because you keep saying stupid things.

Every accusation I've made to you has had basis, as I have put in each post. But you can read reality however you like.

John O. asked what rights homosexuals lacked. You answered that you never favored special rights for homosexuals. He never asked you about special rights, he asked you about normal rights that they lacked. What rights do they lack, tdadams?

As for marriage - when two people marry their families are joined. Marriage is not a private matter. Why should we allow queers to marry?

I don't know why I bother.

Shalom.

338 posted on 06/11/2003 12:37:20 PM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
gays aren't mentally ill.

And that's something you can't prove no matter how mny times you repeat it.

tdadams says: "Point me to a post where I've said I favor special homosexual rights. In fact, I've said just the opposite."

Then tdadams says: "How are you harmed if two people of the same sex want to call themselves married? How are you specifically harmed?"

Now we've ALL seen you argue for homosexual marriage and this quote insinuates the same so stop being a liar and strart taking reponsibility for what you say.

339 posted on 06/11/2003 12:53:47 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
I inserted the word special for clarity since it seemed 'special rights' was what he was implying with the quote marks around the word homosexual.

No I was asking about regular rights. I use quotes around 'homosexual' because I don't believe that such a thing exists. There are people who practice homosexual behavior but there are no 'homosexuals'. Sexual orientation as used by the 'homosexuals' doesn't exist. Everyone is heterosexually inclined, some people are just mentally damaged.

341 posted on 06/11/2003 1:08:38 PM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: tdadams
Are schools being forced to teach that or is that the will of the teachers and the teachers unions?

Here's an example of tdadams' obfuscation and word jugglery. Way back on this thread (maybe another too) I told him that the state of California, through the legislature, mandated in 2001 that grades K-12 have cirriculum espousing and promoting homosexual behavior. His reply? Move from California. Then I asked, it's not about me, I'm concerned for the kids in CA. His answer? You can't save the world, basically screw everyone else.

So he is either consciously lying or is pathological.

351 posted on 06/11/2003 2:47:23 PM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson