To: mvpel
I believe that ownership should never be in question, only the storage of cerain arms. If a person has the means to safely store a munition, as safe as the Army might, then ownership is not a question, it is a given.
85 posted on
04/19/2003 5:22:19 PM PDT by
PatrioticAmerican
(If the only purpose of assault weapons is to kill lots of people quickly, why do police have them?)
To: PatrioticAmerican
I believe that ownership should never be in question, only the storage of cerain arms. If a person has the means to safely store a munition, as safe as the Army might, then ownership is not a question, it is a given.So ownership should never be in question unless you can meet the government's arbitrary "safe" storage requirements. In NYC, the police require you to allow them to inspect your safe in your home.
91 posted on
04/20/2003 10:10:11 AM PDT by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson