Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrioticAmerican
I believe that ownership should never be in question, only the storage of cerain arms. If a person has the means to safely store a munition, as safe as the Army might, then ownership is not a question, it is a given.

So ownership should never be in question unless you can meet the government's arbitrary "safe" storage requirements. In NYC, the police require you to allow them to inspect your safe in your home.

91 posted on 04/20/2003 10:10:11 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel
No law can ever be made to be perfect. That is why the 2nd exists in the first place, but reasonable storage requirements should never denied. Doing so would render all arms owners as nut cases who need to be questioned.

Outlawing the storing of large explosives in a tract home environment is not unresonable.

So, who is to say? WE are to say! Of course, WE haven't voiced much of an opinion until recent history, so WE have lost many rights.
95 posted on 04/20/2003 4:00:17 PM PDT by PatrioticAmerican (If the only purpose of assault weapons is to kill lots of people quickly, why do police have them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson