[Qwerty]

The fact that there are ex-gays means nothing. Many of them just become celibate, and perhaps the ones who are able to "change" were never really homosexual in the first place. In any event, there are very few ex-gays, while there is an enormous amount of societal pressure against homosexuality. That indicates to me that maybe it is not possible for change to occur, or at least extremely difficult and probably only possible for small numbers.

What do bisexuality and incarceration "prove"?

And testimony from who, saying what?

[Kevin Curry]

The fact that there are ex-gays means nothing.

How about the fact there are so-called bisexuals?

Swinging whichever way the wind blows your chimes . . .

I have found that it is the so-called bisexuals that annoy gay activists the most as they try to argue homosexuality is not a behavioral choice. They generally try to avoid discussing so-called bisexuality completely for this reason. Bisexuality puts the lie to their agitprop.

[Kevin Curry]

The fact that there are ex-gays means nothing.

It means quite a bit to ex-gays.

[Clint N. Suhks]

The fact that there are ex-gays means nothing.

Only if you close your eyes to the truth.

Many of them just become celibate, and perhaps the ones who are able to "change" were never really homosexual in the first place.

That’s right…they ALL fit neatly into your speculation.

In any event, there are very few ex-gays,

There are hundreds of thousands.

while there is an enormous amount of societal pressure against homosexuality.

None unwarranted.

That indicates to me that maybe it is not possible for change to occur,

There are hundreds of thousands.

What do bisexuality and incarceration "prove"?

That it’s a choice of behavior.

And testimony from who, saying what?

I gave you’re the link…READ IT.