To: *puff_list; red-dawg; Fiddlstix; RikaStrom; robomatik; ladyinred; error99; Max McGarrity; Gabz; ...
I'm not sure if this person is for smokers or against smokers but they sure do bring out some interesting points.
2 posted on
02/18/2003 1:32:41 PM PST by
Just another Joe
(FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: Just another Joe; aculeus; general_re
I'm not sure if this person is for smokers or against smokers . . . .I'm not sure if this thing is in English.
3 posted on
02/18/2003 1:36:40 PM PST by
dighton
To: Just another Joe
After running this through Babelfish, I think what he's saying is that he's all for lawyers suing everyone, the sky's the limit.
That smokers are st-o-o-o-pid, because evil corporations are pouring oil into their cigarettes and Mr. Natural is still pissed about that paraquat thing.
I think.
To: Just another Joe
I'm not sure if this person is for smokers or against smokers but they sure do bring out some interesting pointI was about to say the excact same thing, can't figure out if this person is coming or going.
To: Just another Joe
I'm with you - hard to decide which side the writer is on.
But one thing he is totally correct about is the money involved in the anti-smoker industry - much of it does come from the pharmaceutical industry. But we all know that.
bookmarking and printing for better read, under better circumstances (I live where more than 2 feet of snow fell recently)
20 posted on
02/18/2003 6:23:48 PM PST by
Gabz
(Snow is beautiful - as long a it is gone tomorrow)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson