[cookcounty]

Suggested investigation: Someone with too much time on their hands should do a statistical analysis of the differing way homosexual pedophilia is reported as opposed to hetero-pedophilia. Whenever a male is molesting a female, the sex of the child seems to be prominently stated. When its homo-pedophilia, it looks to me like the press tends to bury any reference to the sex of the victim.

Given the comparable rates, how much MORE vulnerable are our sons, than our daughters? I'll bet the number is huge.

[yendu bwam]

Someone with too much time on their hands should do a statistical analysis of the differing way homosexual pedophilia is reported as opposed to hetero-pedophilia.

You bet. The New York Times is a prominent example of journalists who refuse to print the whole truth. A daily article on the Catholic scandal with almost never a mention of the fact that almost all of the predators are homosexual. The New York Times is a master of obfuscation in this area - using convenient terms like 'pedophile priests', 'abusers', 'molestors' - every word in the dictionary except homosexual. Bill O'Reilly, just last night, finally had the cojones to admit on the air that most of the Catholic priest molestors are homosexual (and that most of the victims are teenage boys) - it only took him a year to do so.