[for-q-clinton]

I just saw this story on foxnews channel. The RATs are claiming that the photo wasn't taken in Gray's office. They briefly showed one of the photos we're discussing and they had a picture of Gray's office. They were saying it was a different office location.

To me, it looks like they are trying to cover up, because it would be very easy for Gray to say that photo was taken at X location (after all he should know where he received that check) And if he doesn't I'm sure that liberal wanker will remember. But since he can't he needs to try and attack the photo.

[smith288]

For what I can tell, if even FreeRepublic has a debate about its authenticity, I dont think its a good idea to use as a campaign tool anyways....

I want Davis out as much as anyone (I went to LA in '00 and he was atrocious in my short hotel stay)... But this isnt something I wouldnt bank on.

[eureka!]

Re#85 That confirms it, they wouldn't deny it if it wasn't true...

[Congressman Billybob]

The DAMNED $6,000 PIECE OF MODERN ART WILL IDENTIFY THE OFFICE. THERE ARE NOT TWO OF THESE THINGS. EITHER IT WAS IN DAVIS' OFFICIAL OFFICE IN SACRAMENTO, OR IT WASN'T. There have to be literally hundreds of photo-ops with ordinary people in that office. If the art work was there in 1998, then unless some CIA-level photo doctoring was done, these photos are genuine.

And if the photos are genuine, then Davis and the other guy (who now works in the Davis Administration) are liars and criminals.

Billybob