Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LionelHutz
Am I reading you correctly?

Get real, will you?

I'm advocating freedom from busybodies, not doing harm to the unborn.

199 posted on 10/06/2002 12:26:45 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]


To: Madame Dufarge
No, I think I'd like to push this a bit. I've seen two responses here to those that criticize women that smoke while pregnant:

1. There is no real danger to unborn children if there mother smoke.

2. People that criticize mothers that smoke should mind their own business.

If your argument includes #1, then I think that should be the debate. Go ahead and try to make the case that smoking does not harm the unborn.

But if you are arguing #2 without establishing #1, then you are saying nothing other that "it's my body, so it's my choice."

And to go just one step further, if a non- (or anti-, whatever) smoker confronts a pregnant woman who is smoking based on a good faith belief that the smoking is harming the child, isn't that person defending the unborn? If you have a response to them, shouldn't it be only to inform them that they have been "duped" by the anti-smoking forces on this issue?

202 posted on 10/06/2002 12:41:00 PM PDT by LionelHutz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson