Skip to comments.
Drug Laws Won't Be On The Fall Ballot, But Tobacco Money Will
Detroit Free Press ^
| September 11, 2002
| Dawson Bell
Posted on 09/11/2002 4:59:37 PM PDT by riley1992
Edited on 05/07/2004 7:12:40 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
A carefully planned and well-financed campaign to overhaul Michigan's drug laws crashed Tuesday, as the state Supreme Court declined to place the issue before voters in November.
Without comment, the court upheld decisions issued last week by the Court of Appeals and a state elections panel to keep the drug question off the ballot.
(Excerpt) Read more at freep.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: pufflist; sentencing; settlement; spending; tobacco; wodlist
1
posted on
09/11/2002 4:59:37 PM PDT
by
riley1992
To: *Wod_list
To: riley1992
Even though I'm opposed to the WOD, I'm opposed to that bill. Financial costs, and no discretion.
As for the tobacco bill, since the American Lung Association backs it, I'm against it....
To: Dan from Michigan
I would lay down good money that a thorough audit of the tobacco funds would lead a trail almost everywhere except where they were supposed to end up.
4
posted on
09/11/2002 5:21:30 PM PDT
by
riley1992
To: riley1992
Yep, and we'll be a zillion dollars in debt if this thing passes.
And if I had my way, they would be sent to the taxpayers as a tax cut.
To: riley1992
Perhaps the people who drafted the section were high?
6
posted on
09/11/2002 5:24:32 PM PDT
by
perez24
To: perez24
"Dude, pass the joint and number that new Section '24'. That was my locker number in high school."
7
posted on
09/11/2002 5:28:50 PM PDT
by
riley1992
To: riley1992
Reeeeally...So...$oro$ loses one.
: )
To: riley1992; *puff_list; Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; ...
Prop. 4 -- A constitutional amendment to redirect spending of 90 percent of the state's tobacco settlement revenue (estimated at $326 million in 2003). The money is currently spent on college scholarships for students who earn high scores on Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) tests and a variety of other state programs. The amendment would require that most of the money go to hospitals, nursing homes and groups that advocate against smoking. And GROUPS THAT ADVOCATE CONTROL AND BAN SMOKING!
9
posted on
09/11/2002 5:59:26 PM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
I'm glad I read through this thread before I just repeated what you so properly pointed out!!!!!
10
posted on
09/11/2002 6:32:59 PM PDT
by
Gabz
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Bill D. Berger
You're post doesn't exist.
Was the implied flame war that bad?????
13
posted on
09/11/2002 6:49:39 PM PDT
by
Gabz
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: Gabz
I'm glad I read through this thread before I just repeated what you so properly pointed out!!!!! Yea. You and I both know what the word "advocate" means! Nothing less then Control and BAN!
15
posted on
09/11/2002 7:34:05 PM PDT
by
SheLion
To: SheLion
You and I both know what the word "advocate" means! Nothing less then Control and BAN! Let's get this into perspective, here, my friend.
"Advocate" means a paid professional looking out for the best interest of the public.
"Lobbyist" means anyone, including the unpaid citizen who opposes the "Advocate."
16
posted on
09/11/2002 7:54:23 PM PDT
by
Gabz
To: Dan from Michigan
The anti smokers group is getting plenty of money as it is, they just can't seem to get enough.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson