Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SheLion
I wouldn't assume that all smokers know that they have a 15% chance of getting lung cancer.

I smoked twenty years and thought the risks were a lot lower.

I don't support taxes or banning smoking anywhere.

I believe second hand smoke is a scam.

I also now know cigarettes are fatal to 15 out of every 100 smokers(thats just lung cancer, not to mention emphysema and heart disease).

Lung cancer kills about 160,000 Americans every year.

I don't really see the parallel to sunshine with statistics like those.

A lot of smokers don't like to hear these facts, and I don't blame them.

66 posted on 08/01/2002 3:26:22 AM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Rome2000
Oh we know the facts and/or Junk Science!

I also now know cigarettes are fatal to 15 out of every 100 smokers(thats just lung cancer, not to mention emphysema and heart disease).

We all have to die from something. I would rather die knowing I enjoyed my life, then if I had sat in a corner rocking all my life, not enjoying life and things I find enjoyable.

I don't really see the parallel to sunshine with statistics like those.

The anti nico nazi's say that "second hand smoke" is a Class A Carcinogen. I said " the sun is also a Class A Carcinogen. Are they going to ban it too?"

68 posted on 08/01/2002 4:02:25 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Rome2000
I wouldn't assume that all smokers know that they have a 15% chance of getting lung cancer.

I saw one article citing a survey concluding that most smokers think cigarettes are eight times as harmful as they actually are.

92 posted on 08/01/2002 5:56:26 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: Rome2000
I wouldn't assume that all smokers know that they have a 15% chance of getting lung cancer.

Actually, according to most information - smokers OVER estimate, rather than underestimate the risks involved in their habit.

A lot of smokers don't like to hear these facts, and I don't blame them.

I didn't realize that edtimates of increased risks were known as facts. The reason most smokers don't like hearing all of this is because we are sick and tired of it. and we know that most of it is over exageration, or as you say in the case of second hand smoke - it's a scam.

Unfortunately your average person has no idea of the significance, or lack thereof, of the terms used about all of this. Epidemiology and statistics are not exact science and the numbers determined for risks using either science can, and are, manipulated anyway the antis want them to be.

Remember, figures don't lie, but liars figure!!!!

111 posted on 08/01/2002 8:15:37 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson