Replies

You're mad at Ashcroft for executing an unremorful psychotic baby-killer, McVeigh, one of the worst terrorists in the history of this country. I supposed you'd perfer taxpayers fund his three-squares a day for next 50 years. And you want me to believe McVeigh would someone "talk" if kept in prison even though he never has and has absolutely no reason to do so-- he despises the idea.

Hmmm. Those beliefs would fit in nicely with the chorus of bleeding-heart liberals screaming how Bush is such blood-thirsty right-winger for giving criminal scum what they deserve. Remember their "outrage" when he killed Karla Fay Tucker? According to liberals, everyone up for execution is either 1) poor and/or a minority, 2)"truly sorry" for the crime they committee-- they changed their ways, "found God" and have redeemed themselves, etc. etc., OR 3) "about to talk" and name names until they were silenced by government conspricy. The latter was used by bleeding hearts to oppose the execution of John Wayne Gacy (killed dozens of teenage boys) here in Illinois. We were supposed to believe he was gonna give lots of information about where the bodies were, after saying nothing 15 years. I remember all the ultra-lefty Green Party people insisting Governor Edgar was involved in some kind of conspircy to "silence" him. You'd really like these people, the way they rant and rave at conservatives for following the rule of law.

You know what? McVeigh is dead and I couldn't be happier. Not a day too soon. Interesting enough, a fellow named TERRY NICHOLS is still alive. REMEMBER HIM?? (Most of the "McVeigh conspricy" folks have no recollection, since they keep insisting their is a plot to "make us believe" McVeigh "acted ALONE")Terry Nichols was with McVeigh every step of the way and EVERYONE knows it. If there was a conspircy, the government would have to wipe out Nichols to ensure he "wouldn't talk", since he can name the names that McVeigh would have. Nichols is still alive and well in prison, isn't he? Gee, that's odd. The government coverup must not be going right.

I'm certainly not defending mcVeigh. What I am saying is that he didn't act alone. There is plenty to support that: Gen. Partin's (a retired munitions expert) analysis showing that the bldg. could only have been brought down by internally placed bombs placed inside/against structural columns (it must be somewhere on the web), the fact that seismographic evidence shows more than one explosion, the fact that the BATF were told not to report in that day, the fact that videotapes of the bldg. were never released, the fact that David Schippers vouches for a reporter's affadavits of witnesses negating the govt. allegation that he acted alone (it was hard to find witnesses who saw him alone and not in the company of an Arab-looking guy) and the fact that DS correctly stated in Aug. of last year that the NYC financial district was in trouble, the fact that McVeigh's defense was not allowed to assert others' involvement in his trial, the fact that the govt. was in a huge hurry to bury the evidence, the fact that Waco files were kept in the Murrrah Bldg., the fact that Rep. Key was dissatisfied with the whole govt. scenario and gave up his career to get to the bottom of things... There's more, but, frankly, I forget some of it now.

As far as Terry Nichols goes, I don't know why he doesn't seem to present the threat McVeigh did. I do know the TN was in the Philippines (I know his wife is from there) and there is a story that an informer who met with him is now dead because of a hit on him but his wife on her deathbed connected some dots back to OKC. I think that's when the Bojinka Project surfaced.

Karla Faye Tucker et al. are testimony to W's "tough on crime" stance.