Replies

Bush and Ashcroft continue the cover-up... </>

In collusion with the CFR, the Bilderbergers, and the TC too I'll bet ...

Say - isn't Ashcroft a Christian?

So the CHURCHES are in on it too ...

You and your government-supplied responses no longer have credibility. Go out and get a real job.

Well, you have certainly vehemently sided with Reno, Freeh and Clinton on this matter.

Let me ask you Jim, have you ever seen the tapes of the local OKC news broadcast LIVE, IN REAL TIME, where they report that FBI agents on the scene that day found "2 ADDITIONAL huge unexploded bombs INSIDE the Murrah bldg" which were "bigger than the one that did the damage"?

If so, what do you make of those tapes? If not -- WHY not. since you appear to be such an expert on all things OKC?

Has everone forgotten about Michael Fortier who has TESTIFIED he was contacrted DIRECTLY by McVeigh for recruitment in the Murrah Building bombing?
Yes ...
Has everyone forgotten about the theories that it was an inside job using cutter charges with ADVANCE NOTICE given to certain feds AS PROPOSED by noneother than michael rivero and ex-USAF bomb-dropper Gen Partin?

Yes ...

All true _Jim and it all fits into the reason for the cover up,IMHO

After examining the known facts, the most likely explanation that is consistent with what we know to be true is that the OKC bombing was an attempt by U.S. intelligence assets to infiltrate the Middle Eastern terrorist network that was and is at war with the U.S.

Numerous "domestic" terrorist" groups had been heavily infiltrated by federal operatives for years. Federal operatives inside these domestic organizations may have orchestrated an alliance with the Middle Eastern terrorist cells operating in the U.S. to gain intelligence information on Middle Eastern terrorists.

An intelligence asset attempting to infiltrate a terrorist organization would not gain the confidence of the leaders of the organization without killing people. In my opinion, a decision was made at the highest level to sacrifice the victims in Oklahoma in order for one or more intelligence operatives to move up in the terrorist network. In addition, by focusing blame on the people disturbed by Waco, Clinton could achieve a domestic political "victory" with the cover of a "legitimate" intelligence operation and invoke National Security to insure Congress and the Courts went along (as well as a Governor).

For folks in Washington, losing the Murrah Building may have been necessary to gain intelligence to prevent a potential attack on the political infrastructure. Please consider a "dirty" bomb exploding outside the Capitol Building during a State of the Union address and the effect on our elected leaders. This is the nightmare scenario our intelligence community is expected to defend against. I reject the sacrifice of innocent civilians for whatever the purpose and believe the operation should be exposed for what it was and those responsible should be held accountable. The failures that began in OKC resulted in the attack on 9-11.