Skip to comments.
White House hints it may buy up oil leases
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 06/20/2002
| Marc Sandalow
Posted on 06/20/2002 8:33:13 AM PDT by Pokey78
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:40:24 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
06/20/2002 8:33:13 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
This would be really cool. More oil (which everyone likes these days) and it makes Grey-out Davis look bad.
To: Dialup Llama
RATS. Oh buy them up and NOT use them. I suppose I should try to read these articles first. Never mind.
To: Dialup Llama
Yup -- not use them. Same political strategy as Florida. Once again politics trumps making the U.S. less dependent on foreign oil.
To: Pokey78
"The fact that Secretary Norton wrote to another Republican candidate for governor, before responding (to similar requests from) our governor and two senators, is something that we find an insult to Californians," she said. heheheh
To: browardchad
We're saving the oil for the Aztlan'ers to loot.
To: browardchad
Yup -- not use them. Same political strategy as Florida. Once again politics trumps making the U.S. less dependent on foreign oil.I am so in agreement with you. It appears that once again, President Bush has sold his soul to the devil for the sake of political gain.
7
posted on
06/20/2002 8:51:49 AM PDT
by
skateman
To: skateman
Well, it that political gain is to get a republican in charge of California, I am all for it. I don't know if you live in Ca. of not, but the Democrats are completely destroying this state. After they have destroyed Ca., they will move to a state near you and destroy it. They must be stopped, they can not be reasoned with they must be destroyed.
To: browardchad; Miss Marple; Poohbah; Howlin
If we make a big oil deal with Russia, we still screw over the OPEC cartel. The fatc is, right now, we have a much tougher task in getting domestic oil drilling than we thought, so we have to pull back, re-group, and try again later.
9
posted on
06/20/2002 9:03:28 AM PDT
by
hchutch
To: Pokey78
What great news.
Wonder which credit card our president will use to make these purchases? With the buying spree that has been going on non-stop the cards are maxed out.
Of course we can still give half a billion to Africa to fight AIDS.
To: skateman
George Bush is using your money to try and buy a few environmental votes while paying off a bunch of fatcats who knew perfectly well when they made their investment that they may not get drilling permits from the government. This is welfare for millionaires, pure and simple.
The only difference between Republicans and Democrats is who gets plundered and who gets the spoils.
Actually, like the pigs and humans in Animal Farm, they're both beginning to resemble each other.
To: browardchad
There is no way and no how someone who favored drilling off the coast of California could ever get elected. That's the fact of the matter, period. And since this is a representative republic, those representatitives must listen to the wishes of their constituents.
California is currently being run into the ground by a near completely controlled Democratic government. If Simon can get into the Governor's office and he has to oppose offshore drilling, then so be it. Again, 75% (if not more) of the people of CA oppose offshore drilling. To run against the wishes of the overwhelming majority would be folly.
Seems to me it makes more sense appeasing the 70 to 80 percenters than it does the 5 to 20 percenters.
And this doesn't equate to not drilling in Alaska where 75 to 80% of the locals do favor drilling up there. It's called local politics and I welcome the federal government respecting it.
12
posted on
06/20/2002 9:16:24 AM PDT
by
Wphile
To: Pokey78
If drilling is ok in the Gulf of Mexico then why not off Kalifornia? Never once have we had a oil slick wash up on our beaches that I can remember. Drilling and production technology is very advanced and the risks of accident has been signifcantly reduced over the last decade.
To: Wphile
Excellent point. The sad fact is that the folks in Florida and California aren't desperate enough to accept it, so we must re-group and try again elsewhere.
14
posted on
06/20/2002 9:31:07 AM PDT
by
hchutch
To: hchutch
Yep, Californians and Floridians want to have their cake and eat it too. Fortunately, we have Texas and Louisiana to bail the rest of us out.
15
posted on
06/20/2002 9:39:54 AM PDT
by
Wphile
To: browardchad
Or even worse use them with the govt in charge of the oil business!!!
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
fyi
To: Let's Roll
This is what I am wondering about - buy them up and then use them when America is in a strangle hold from the Mideast and Russia is not coming through. If that occurs - the administration then puts the options before the American public and they can decide if California and Florida will have to join in with the Gulf drilling to keep America going.
If this happens - the price for the leases will go up also for those wanting to drill and the increase could help pay off the investment. Sometimes it is nice to have oil men in the government.
18
posted on
06/20/2002 12:31:04 PM PDT
by
ClancyJ
To: ClancyJ
I understand what you mean, but who knows who will be in the WH when/if this is needed?
Fingers-crossed.
To: Free the USA; *calgov2002; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; eureka!; ElkGroveDan; ...
Thanks for the ping!
calgov2002:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson