Replies

Hey Reg,

Why don't you put together a cartoon that translates Ann's gibberish above for the benefit of English speaking kids. Does Babblefish have a "Peyote-English" translator? Your maid seems silly .. this thing is not defenseable and no Bush supporter is able to be legitimately satirized here. There's no allegation to even defend. Well, I'm pretty sure that Russ Feingold is not a Stalinist. He's always been a Trotsky kinda guy in my judgement.

Unless you wish to enlighten me on what the eff she's saying that makes me blind to Bush's blunders? Cuz I'm needin 'splainin Lucy.

You and I both know Bush doesn't appear to be working the conservative cause right now (outside of the War on Terror, which is everyone's cause). If dollars speak for ideology, then it's apparent he's pandering to the left. From the Minority home ownership plan to this obscene AIDS package, he apparently either 1) truly believes in these causes (SHOCKING IF TRUE!) or 2) is using tax dollars to build inroads with these interest groups. That may be the point, but what really shocks conservatives on this forum is the fact that it looks as if he has abandoned his principles to build in-roads with a group that will not leave their dance partner, the Democratic party. So why do it? The only conclusion we can draw,("we", meaning the Bush Confused Conservative or BCC), is the man may actually believe in this Socialist "We are the world" crapola.

The BCC would love to support this guy, we love his military leadership, his moral dedication to the office, but when people come onto threads debating the ridiculous stance of NOT racially profiling at airports, especially after 9-11, why, frankly, our intelligence is insulted by this ignorance. We know that this is an indefensible stand to take post 9-11, unless it is being done to do nothing but make us feel happy thoughts, hence my Cleaning Lady. And those, btw, are the Bush supporters that can be satired ;-)

Now, what I believe this article by Coulter is saying that prior to 9-11, Bush made statements to the fact that he did not believe in racial profiling as a security measure at airports, and I and most others would agree back then that if that was done, it was being done with little or no merit. It was wrong then, but this is now, post 9-11, Bush is not addressing the issue of racial profiling and neither is his Director of the FBI, in fact his airport security measures are an indication that he continues on with this insane no-profiling stand when it is obvious to all that it should be done. While little ladies and Gore are being searched, terrorists that meet the profile are apparently not due to the anti-profiling nature of the airport security.

In fact, we know that the liberal "fetish" regarding the profiling issue is partly responsible for the FBI not acting on the information they had concerning the flight schools. Due to this being a fetish of the left, the wise thing to do would be to do the thorough and complete checks of these middle-eastern males in combination with spot checks of non m-e passengers, and doing so without public comment.

So rather than address the obvious, that we need to be examining everyone coming into our country that meets the terrorist profile, Bush is paying homage to the left by not addressing this serious issue. Meanwhile, old ladies and Gore are being searched at the airports, a directive from this Administration. Now, as a frequent airline passenger myself, I want to give Bush the benefit of the doubt, that he's actually doing what I suggested. But from my first hand experience, he apparently has not given those orders yet. And the elephant in the room, he just stands there.