2 posted on
06/14/2002 9:33:08 AM PDT by
Mo1
To: laureldrive
Effective prosecution of the criminal trading practices of late might help to restore a little confidence also. As long as the crooks go free with a 10% or so fine, who could trust the market?
3 posted on
06/14/2002 9:37:15 AM PDT by
steve50
To: laureldrive
The bubble is bursting. How would you explain the large govt spending of the 90s along with the large increase in profits?
4 posted on
06/14/2002 9:42:32 AM PDT by
JHawker
To: laureldrive
Don't you know it is
treason to draw attention to the disintegrating stock market, the falling dollar, or the return of deificit spending??? GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!
Keep this up, and you'll be classified an "enemy combatant" and the mastermind of a plot to destroy the US economy.
To: laureldrive
Thanks for the post.
This needs exposure BIGTIME.
Link from last night's posting - same article
This is a dangerous time for our country, and it is made worse by the rampant fiscal irresponsibility of our elected officials. I don't blame President Bush for this as he is only inheriting a system that is corrupt beyond our worse nightmares AND is already fighting a war for our very existence as a nation.
Socialism Kills.
To: laureldrive
the politicians in washington are spending taxpayers money as fast as they can vote...
To: laureldrive
Bush talks big, like all Republicrats, but he doesn't actually
do anything to even hold the line on Big Nanny Government, much less make it even the tiniest bit smaller.
Has he vetoed anything? He's blown spending all to hell but doesn't seem to give a damn about how much government spends, regulates, taxes or confiscates.
Just another Republican, in other words.
To: laureldrive
Rahn doesn't know diddly about the market, nor is his diagnosis worth the paer its written on.It would help if he understood WHY the US economy did so well from 1995-2000 and the STRUCTURAL reasons why, then he maybe able to figure out if the incentives to growth, and what type of growth, are correct.
Plus, its also normal for re-tests of blowoff bottoms, like the Sept 21 2001 one, to be made.NORMAL, healthy, and if it takes chicken little headlines to get it to where it should go, then what's the worry??
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson