If a Democrat Administration did this you would be saying more than they were "re-writing" the Constitution. Words like trashing, destroying, warping, disfiguring would be words you would probably use. Did I mean he was literally "re-writing" the Constitution? You and I both know that I didn't, but far be it from you to miss an opportunity to twist what I said and avoid the point of the question.
So, answer the question and stop your spinning.
No, excuse me! I DID conclude that is what you meant, because that is what you said. I take people's words literally. I take what they say seriously. If that is not what you meant, you should have been more careful how you articulated what you meant. It seemed to me that your whole point was based on the notion that the Solicitor General was "re-writing" the Constitution based on an opinion he expressed to the Court. Minus this, I don't know what your point was.