Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spiff
Did I mean he was literally "re-writing" the Constitution? You and I both know that I didn't

No, excuse me! I DID conclude that is what you meant, because that is what you said. I take people's words literally. I take what they say seriously. If that is not what you meant, you should have been more careful how you articulated what you meant. It seemed to me that your whole point was based on the notion that the Solicitor General was "re-writing" the Constitution based on an opinion he expressed to the Court. Minus this, I don't know what your point was.

808 posted on 06/05/2002 11:09:56 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies ]


To: My2Cents
Original post 261, deleted by the moderator for some reason -- probably for petty personal reasons -- here reposted:

I don't even LOOK at those threads [the anti-Lincoln threads]. I've seen some of the comments. It's enough to make a person sick.

My2Cents, striking a blow for free speech on "Free" Republic!

827 posted on 06/05/2002 11:30:01 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
No, excuse me! I DID conclude that is what you meant, because that is what you said. I take people's words literally. I take what they say seriously. If that is not what you meant, you should have been more careful how you articulated what you meant. It seemed to me that your whole point was based on the notion that the Solicitor General was "re-writing" the Constitution based on an opinion he expressed to the Court. Minus this, I don't know what your point was.

No overabundance of gray matter crowding your skull, is there...

950 posted on 06/06/2002 6:14:24 AM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson