Replies

No, you didn't. Pat Buchanon has publicly called for our embargo against Cuba to be lifted. That's not Conservative.

I come up with a list a mile long for why Bush isn't conservative at Post 38 and all you can come up for why Buchanan isn't a conservative is because he supports free trade with Cuba?? I wouldn't say that the issue of trade with Cuba is a very defining issue for conservatives. I think the issue of unilaterally destroying 75% of our strategic nuclear arsenal is a much more defining issue for conservatives. Buchanan opposes destroying our nuclear arsenal. Bush supports it. Buchanan opposes taxpayser subsidized trade, permanent MFN trade status and WTO membership, supercomputers, and US nuclear plants for the Butchers of Beijing who hold the record as the most mass-murdering regime in world history. Bush supports rewarding the Butchers of Beijing with all of these benefits so that his globalist financiers can make a buck or two. Bush supports the UN and his father's dream of realizing a New World Order. Buchanan wants to throw the UN out and bring the New World Order crashing down. So, I ask you, who is the real conservative here. Let me give you a clue. It ain't Bush.

"Bush supports the UN and his father's dream of realizing a New World Order."

Nonsense. Bush pulled the U.S. out of the International Criminal Court. NWO proponents support the ICC, yet Bush clearly opposes it.

Bush told the UN to stuff their International Ban On Small Arms Trafficking Treaty, too. That's standing up for our Second Amendment rights and putting the UN back in its place on the shelf, hardly a New World Order position to take. Heck, Ashcroft is investigating Koffi Anan's UN security guards for illegally importing their own weapons into the UN in New York. That's hardly a pro-UN position to take!

New World Order types are big on the Kyoto Treaty. Care to admit what Bush did to that one? No. Let me guess, you'll claim some Rush-esque Kyoto-lite nonsense now that you've been called tot he carpet on that one...