Bush's Record Calls into Question His Conservative Label

The American Partisan ^ | June 5, 2002 | David T. Pyne

[rightwing2]

Nonsense. Bush pulled the U.S. out of the International Criminal Court. NWO proponents support the ICC, yet Bush clearly opposes it. New World Order types are big on the Kyoto Treaty. Care to admit what Bush did to that one? No. Let me guess, you'll claim some Rush-esque Kyoto-lite nonsense now that you've been called tot he carpet on that one...

Yes, Bush announced the US will not be bound by the ICC despite the Clinton presidential signature. However, Bush has signed an agreement with Russia to unilaterally disarm the US into a second-class nuclear power. How much more New World Order can you get than that? Bush also supports implemention of the Kyoto Treaty on the sly according to a couple of recent conservative editorials in the moderately conservative Washington Times. Bush supports a Clinton-era plan to disarm the US military of its tanks, tracked vehicles and much of its artillery. Bush refused to reverse Clinton's executive orders federalizing millions of acres of land. He has failed to oppose the UN Biodiversity Treaty which claims sovereignity over such federalized lands. Bush supports the UN and enforces UN edicts with US military forces used as UN peacekeepers in scores of nations the world over from Iraq to Kosovo. Hardly the record of an anti-NWO President.

[rightwing2]

I guess we are suppose to believe he's better at politics then what he does for a living?

Well, I would argue that you don't have to make a career at something to be good at analyzing a given subject. For example, some of the best political commentary is done not by politicians but by columnists, journalists and editorialists. Plus, this guy's bio says he's a VP with the Virginia Republican Assembly so that means that he is probably politically savvy.

[rightwing2]

Who was Buchanon's running mate?

Ezola Foster, a renowned black anti-immigration, anti-affirmative action, anti-feminist lady who is a former member of the John Birch Society. I rest my case. Buchanan is and always has been an arch-conservative. Otherwise, why would he have chosen a former member of the John Birch Society to be his running mate? To say otherwise, is being intellectually dishonest.

[rightwing2]

Dopey Pat let them string him along for a while, with dreams of a big money and endorsements from the corrupt socialist cabals.

Post #144 is for you. I'll await your response to my rhetorical question of why Pat Buchanan chose a prominent member of the John Birch Society to be his Vice Presidential running mate if he was the socialist scum-sucker you claim he was. Man, have you got egg on your face on this one!

[dead]

Spewing Goebbel's big lies? Pat's VP was Foster, a black lady.

You’d have a point if I said otherwise. But I didn’t. Learn to read.

I said Lenora was Pat’s Marxist sidekick, which as co-chairman of Buchanan's (not Perot’s) campaign, she undoubtedly was.

Sorry if his choice of political bedfellows embarrasses you, but you voted for him, not me.

Pat wants to conserve America first. That makes him the best conservative in politics today.

Usually one must open a Hallmark card to find such an astute and irrefutable nugget of political insight.

[rightwing2]

I am arguing for some more intellectual honesty in the "conservative" crowd. You seem to have it with your fair-minded comments, but a lot of Bush apologists don't.

What part of the above did you not understand. If you would re-read what I wrote you would have realized that I was praising you for having the intellectual dishonesty that Bush apologists don't. Why do you keep insisting that we are at odds, taunting me with "flame wars" and such when it is painfully obvious that we are in 90% agreement with each other?

[ex-snook]

"Post #144 is for you. I'll await your response to my rhetorical question of why Pat Buchanan chose a prominent member of the John Birch Society to be his Vice Presidential running mate if he was the socialist scum-sucker you claim he was. Man, have you got egg on your face on this one! "

Hey their supply of name calling knows no limits. Now Pat will be called a Fascist. You know just keep repeating some Goebbel's smear balls until something sticks. Some people just don't like Pat's putting American interests first.

[dead]

Man, have you got egg on your face on this one!

I never brought up Pat's VP selection (she's a fine lady, other than her insurance fraud problems.)

I brought up his Marxist campaign co-chair.

(The egg you're seeing is the one Pat laid on election day.)

[Deb]

Phony lists...the last refuge of a coward/liar/phony.

[ex-snook]

"I said Lenora was Pat’s Marxist sidekick, which as co-chairman of Buchanan's (not Perot’s) campaign, she undoubtedly was. "

Half-truth. But she was bounced by Pat, wasn't she? You should be happy that Pat did not let a Marxist take over the Reform Party. Pat's 'sidekick' during the campaign was black conservative, Foster.

[dead]

You seem quite obsessed with Foster's skin tone. I don't know why.

I'm curious, can you mention her name just once without the word "black" in the sentence?

[caddie]

I can suggest some history books for you to read, as well.

[rightwing2]

Hey their supply of name calling knows no limits. Now Pat will be called a Fascist. You know just keep repeating some Goebbel's smear balls until something sticks. Some people just don't like Pat's putting American interests first.

Pat Buchanan is a conservative hero and always will be. To me, the JBS is laudably conservative, not some kind of Commie-smear! Dead can lie and say Pat's a socialist all he wants but it won't change the facts. Pat's VP appointment proves beyond all doubt that Pat Buchanan believes in putting America and conservative principles first all the time and on every issue.

[rdavis84]

O.K., one issue was the Abortion Funding. He re-instated the Ban that Reagan had put into effect -----Bush To Reinstate Ban
On Federal Abortion Funding

(MCNS) -- In his first major policy action since becoming president on Saturday, President George W. Bush signed a memorandum today reinstating a policy bars U.S. aid to overseas family-planning programs that include abortion counseling.

The so-called Mexico City policy, which President Reagan announced in 1984 and which remained in place until President Clinton overturned it in his second day in office.

Good, and Correct Move.

Then he approves Stem Cell Funding (btw, where do the Stem Cells come from?)

	Bush OKs Stem Cell Funding By Kristen Philipkoski
	Print this  •  E-mail it 1:40 p.m. Aug. 9, 2001 PDT President Bush will allow the government, with certain restrictions, to fund embryonic stem cell research, a decision that could help scientists find cures to several ailments, but could cost the President votes among conservatives.

Then he overwrote two Pro-Labor Union E.O's that Slick issued.  -- Good Move.

Then he starts further easing illegal Migration from Mexico of massive amounts of Cheap Labor.

So what has the Nation Gained except a different way to Rule?

[Southack]

Have you confused me with someone else?

[Protagoras]

I can suggest some history books for you to read, as well.

History is replete with examples of the harm done by the ignorance and oppression of rulers with regard to tariffs and the harm that can be done by misusing them. I was going to suggest some history books to you as well, but I figured you should start with one thing at a time when you have so far to go.

[dead]

Dead can lie and say Pat's a socialist all he wants but it won't change the facts.

Speaking of lies, you’ve repeatedly said that I called Pat a “socialist”, which I did not.

I called Pat a suck-up to the “socialist unions”, which he is.

Reading comprehension has never been a brigadeer strong point.

The funny thing is, I spent my first few posts on this thread trashing Bush, but the brigadeers always kindly remind me of the dearth of conservative alternatives I was presented with on election day.

[rightwing2]

I never brought up Pat's VP selection (she's a fine lady, other than her insurance fraud problems.) I brought up his Marxist campaign co-chair. (The egg you're seeing is the one Pat laid on election day.)

You never brought up Pat's VP selection, because it ABSOLUTELY DESTROYS your intellectually dishonest hypothesis that Pat is some kind of socialist scumbag! How many socialists do you know choose members of the ultraconservative John Birch Society as their running mates. I mean, you just don't get any more conservative than the John Birch Society. You still have failed to explain why Pat would do that. I shall await your answer. What's that, you say you don't have a response? Oh well, that's what I thought...

BTW, Pat Buchanan discarded Leonora Fulani like a used cigarette after he refused to back her attempt to become the Reform Party Chairwoman. Why? Because Pat Buchanan didn't support anything that she stood for! This was an alliance of convenience to accomplish the laudable conservative end of Pat's goal of capturing control of a "major" political party and Buchananizing it, thereby transforming it into a socially conservative agent for change. I guessed you missed the whole point of that strategem, didn't you.

[dead]

Still repeating lies to try to make your case, I see. I never called Pat a socialist.

From John Birchers to socialist-unions, from Marxists to Perotistas, Pat courted any group he thought he could draw into his quixotic campaign.

If Charles Manson had a voting block, some campaign funds, or some ballot access connections, Pat would have promised him a cabinet position.