Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Day
"Ms. Logan's chest, on the other hand, is much more natural and esthetically pleasing, as you can see from the other pictures in this thread. The word "udders" does not apply."

I DID sort out the shots and noted the ones of Ms. Logan. However, as I said in another reply, anything over a small B-cup to me - TO ME - is a turn-off. Anything in the "D" range and over is udderly unattractive to me - despite the fact that others might find such prodigies "aesthetically-pleasing." If you like that sort of thing, fine.

I like "just a mouthful," if you please. Anything larger just flops around, looks silly, and is a big gravity-magnet.

Michael

34 posted on 05/23/2002 7:46:40 AM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Wright is right!
"I like "just a mouthful," if you please. Anything larger just flops around, looks silly, and is a big gravity-magnet."

Buffalo Head nailed you but good! You sir, have have exposed yourself to be a world class jerk who probably hasn't enjoyed anything by self administrated sex in decades. Those that talk about it, very seldom are getting any of the real thing.

For the record, please describe the last female that found anything attractive about you (Sheep not included).

37 posted on 05/24/2002 10:31:12 AM PDT by Jean B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson