Replies

Please see my reply #49.

Also, Davis statment outside of the OKC COunty Grand Jury was misleading and deceptive in my opinion given that she knew the details of the prior warnign notice from Bodansky (March 3, 1995 memo)showed the USG had advanced warning of A ME attack on the Murrah building with the help of "lilly whites".

Also Davis caled me twice just before both of her Grand jury appearances to threaten me to shut up about FBI agent misconduct and about the prior warning notice. When I pressed her (during the second time she called) about if she had told the grand jury, she responded that she would deny evey thing we had discussed if I said anythoing publicly. Her actions and statements to me do make me wonder seriously if she was forth coming to the Grand Jury about EVERYTHING (not just the things brought up by the poster in reply #48)-I doubt it.

I believe Davis deliberately helped block ( and Davis bragged to me to me about blocking it)Jones from learning of the details of the BOdnasky forewaring memo at the McVeigh trial.

I thought this post from another thread might be helpful on this thread. Here it is:

I appreciate that. I also remembered that she tried to get ABC News interested. I think it was in the same time frame as the McVeigh execution. It was someone from the morning show that I had contacted because I was upset with them for using Samir Khalil as an example of someone who had lost someone in the bombing. (his ex-wife). It started a dialogue with the person that I talked to and Jayna tried to get him interested in the story of the prior warning among other things. It is so important that people are now listening and I hope that some of these groups and people will be investigated.

As far as giving information to the McVeigh team, what I understand is that Jayna would have had to go to jail or reveal her source. It was something about it being a Federal death penalty case and she could not stand on reporter/source privilege, or whatever that is called. Then if she gave up her source, that source would then have to go to jail or reveal his sources which would probably put lives at risk. Also, there could have been a mistrial since the government was not giving everything that they should have to McVeigh's defense. The monkey really should be on the back of the government on this, not on Jayna, since they didn't want any of the ME stuff to come out. Actually, it was out of Jayna's hands, anyway, because Judge Matsch wouldn't allow anything about the ME connection. It obviously was not necessary to bring in the ME connection to get a conviction and maybe Matsch knew that. I don't know for sure why he didn't allow it.

Also, I believe Jayna was pregnant at the time and still technically employed by KFOR. Even though she had walked out, they still considered her under contract and they were paying her medical insurance. The lawsuit against the station by Hussain determined a lot of what they would let her do. She was still bound legally by what the lawyers were telling her to do. They did allow her to have her own lawyer, but he was being paid by the liability company on the lawsuit.

187 posted on 7/12/02 3:22 PM Central by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

Here is another post that I did on another thread that maybe helpful:

I have known for several years that OKCSubmariner had been asked to quit using two reporters names at KFOR when he went on talk shows.

I am sure that most Freepers would rather have just good insight from other Freepers and I feel most comfortable doing that. It is not pleasant to have to confront someone with untruths. And you good folks don't know the inside scoop. If you were to put OKCSub and I in a room and I gave you my background, it would be so reassuring to all of you. I have been at my present company for 16 years or thereabouts and am in a very high level position. I come in contact with many prominent citizens of this city and am friends with many of them, also. I have written one lengthy article on the bombing back in 1999 that was actually published in a Colorado paper, but I am not a writer by profession so that is why it was just one. It was totally based on things in the public record because of my frustration of someone not putting it all together. I got that out of my system so have not written any more. I have been appointed to a state committee as a parent volunteer that had to do with education that had great success my last year in bringing a conservative voice to our decisions. I am presently on a county committee for my denomination that deals with ethical issues. Only about three of us are lay people. I am also involved in a national organization that deals with political issues.

Pat gave his background and it is impressive. But he has indicated that he is unemployed, evidently since 1986. I cannot compete time-wise with that. I have a new grandson I want to spend time with, I need to help Jayna with things she needs to get done and I have a full-time job. I will do my best to give some insight that may be helpful, but it is eating my gut out to hear the lies that OKCSub keeps on posting, and it does not seem to help with the Freepers to have my insight. Most seem to not want to listen and even think that the government is out to get him when I try to set the record straight. I know how Jayna felt when no one seems to want to listen.

189 posted on 7/12/02 3:53 PM Central by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]