Davis was told by many for years and knew the importance of making the details public at the McVeigh trials (she knew that Jones wanted her her testify about the prior warning memo and was succesful through her attorney Jones attempt), at the OK County Grand jury and before the public for over five years and yet she did not go public witht he details. This was very wrong on Davis part in my opinion. ANd Bodasnky was wrong to keep the details from the public for over six years.
Why did Bodansky and Davis wait so long (six years) to go public? Waiting so long hurt the pulbics chances of having the FBI reformed before 9/11 and preventied the entire story of the OKC bombing and the FBIs and McVeighs complete roles from being known at the appropriate time.
The poster of reply #46 is mistaken about what Brad Edwards told me about Davis in front of my son in person. If Davis denies it, then it is regretable and if Edwards does not remember it is unfortunate. I have copies of what I sent Edwards still marked up the way they were sent to Edwards at KFORTV before Edwards says Davis stole them.
The poster should be very concerned that I am telling the truth about these matters. How is she going to feel when she finds out someday I was telling the truth and she was very incorrect? I pray that Jesus Christ will reveal to the poster that I am telling the truth despite Davis and Edwards saying that they do not know what I am talking about.
By the way, the phrase Pat Briley "does not know what he is talking about" has been repeated before by Schippers to my source very close to Schippers. Schippers (if the source is correct), like the poster of #46, are very incorrect. And a second source (very reliable) very close to Schippers now tells me Schippers admitted that Davis falsely denigrated me to Schippers. Could that be why Schippers and the poster of #166 incorrectly claim that I do not know what I am talking about? Has Davis also given incorrect denigrating statements about me to the poster of #166 like Davis did to Schippers??
Also the poster of reply #46 is incorrect about Davis discussing Dan Vogels misconduct with me over threatts my wife received after being told by Vogels wife about the FBI agents being kept out ot the Murrah Building and expecting the bombing on April 19, 1995.. Davis also knows about Vogel abruptly and improperly hanging up the phone on me on April 21, 1995 when I tried to give him leads about a helicopter seen above the Murrah building right before the blast. THe helicopter was also seen by Brad Edwards (KFORTV)friends. Davis also knows that VOgel tried to set up a fake meeting with me in 1996 with mitilita leaders (which I did not attend).
If I were to give the poster of reply #46 the benefit of the doubt, I would save the poster was not fully and properly informed by Davis. Did Davis forget these things or is Davis trying to deny things that she knows are true? I still pray for Davis and the poster. The truth will prevail.
Yes, it is- and since we have stories & counter-stories, charges & counter-charges, the only thing I can see to do is toss it all out there and let everyone sift through all of it and see what shakes out.
The only position I am ready to assume and defend so far is this- the truth has not been told, and much has been hidden.