Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: honway; backhoe; lawdog; Uncle Bill; aristeides; Fred Mertz; glorygirl; MizSterious; archy; ...
Jayna Davis refused to make the details of the Bodansky official prior warning notice public of the OKC bombing to the House from 1995 until 2001 even though I and many others urged her to do so (even though she would not tells the details). Bodansky told Davis not to make the memo details public becasue it was "too hot" (tring to protected government officails).

Davis was told by many for years and knew the importance of making the details public at the McVeigh trials (she knew that Jones wanted her her testify about the prior warning memo and was succesful through her attorney Jones attempt), at the OK County Grand jury and before the public for over five years and yet she did not go public witht he details. This was very wrong on Davis part in my opinion. ANd Bodasnky was wrong to keep the details from the public for over six years.

Why did Bodansky and Davis wait so long (six years) to go public? Waiting so long hurt the pulbics chances of having the FBI reformed before 9/11 and preventied the entire story of the OKC bombing and the FBIs and McVeighs complete roles from being known at the appropriate time.

47 posted on 07/12/2002 9:34:57 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: All; BlueDogDemo; Nita Nupress
Here is a run down of who all Jayna went to and when from Post #41. The wording in post #47 made it sound like she was not forthcoming with the Grand Jury. I have posted three times information on the grand jury.

This is where Jayna went to try to get people to listen:

January of 1997 – Oklahoma County D.A.’s office
1997-Grand Jury (another lie of OKCSubmariner is that she did not tell the Grand Jury about the prior warning-not true- she was totally upfront with them but who knows what the FBI said or the D.A.’s office said to contradict her. One of the assistant D.A.’s did contact Bodansky)
1997-FBI office
1999-FBI office
May, 2001-McVeigh’s defense team. McVeigh’s lawyers evidently do not want to pursue the information.
2000 and 2001-Nichols defense team (both state and federal)
Congress (both houses)






48 posted on 07/12/2002 9:47:10 AM PDT by Nancie Drew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: honway; Dixie Mom; amom; okkev68; cgk; glorygirl; lawdog; Uncle Bill; Fred Mertz; MizSterious; ...
My son David Briley was a witness present when Brad Edwards told me at KFORTV about Davis thefts from Edwards of my info on the Iraqis I had sent Edwards. My son was 19 years old at the time and a student at the University of Oklahoma. Davids still vividly recalls what Edwards told me in person about Davis at KFORTV.

The poster of reply #46 is mistaken about what Brad Edwards told me about Davis in front of my son in person. If Davis denies it, then it is regretable and if Edwards does not remember it is unfortunate. I have copies of what I sent Edwards still marked up the way they were sent to Edwards at KFORTV before Edwards says Davis stole them.

The poster should be very concerned that I am telling the truth about these matters. How is she going to feel when she finds out someday I was telling the truth and she was very incorrect? I pray that Jesus Christ will reveal to the poster that I am telling the truth despite Davis and Edwards saying that they do not know what I am talking about.

By the way, the phrase Pat Briley "does not know what he is talking about" has been repeated before by Schippers to my source very close to Schippers. Schippers (if the source is correct), like the poster of #46, are very incorrect. And a second source (very reliable) very close to Schippers now tells me Schippers admitted that Davis falsely denigrated me to Schippers. Could that be why Schippers and the poster of #166 incorrectly claim that I do not know what I am talking about? Has Davis also given incorrect denigrating statements about me to the poster of #166 like Davis did to Schippers??

Also the poster of reply #46 is incorrect about Davis discussing Dan Vogels misconduct with me over threatts my wife received after being told by Vogels wife about the FBI agents being kept out ot the Murrah Building and expecting the bombing on April 19, 1995.. Davis also knows about Vogel abruptly and improperly hanging up the phone on me on April 21, 1995 when I tried to give him leads about a helicopter seen above the Murrah building right before the blast. THe helicopter was also seen by Brad Edwards (KFORTV)friends. Davis also knows that VOgel tried to set up a fake meeting with me in 1996 with mitilita leaders (which I did not attend).

If I were to give the poster of reply #46 the benefit of the doubt, I would save the poster was not fully and properly informed by Davis. Did Davis forget these things or is Davis trying to deny things that she knows are true? I still pray for Davis and the poster. The truth will prevail.

49 posted on 07/12/2002 9:50:09 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: OKCSubmariner; Nancie Drew; Nita Nupress
It is not just the 30 or 40 or so that read his postings. (or it could be even more with all those lurkers, how about it Ann). Evidently, it is going out to media outlets.

Yes, it is- and since we have stories & counter-stories, charges & counter-charges, the only thing I can see to do is toss it all out there and let everyone sift through all of it and see what shakes out.

The only position I am ready to assume and defend so far is this- the truth has not been told, and much has been hidden.

51 posted on 07/12/2002 10:12:26 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson