Posted on 05/01/2002 4:03:29 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Many of these 'porn' images are from photographs that old, I believe.
After reading the article posted here,
http://64.225.95.82/dcf/Danielle/2038.html
It seems like the kind of organizing into folders and subfolders that would be set up on the site where these files were downloaded from.
Even so, in the testimony that I saw, they have not been able to get anyone in Law Enforcement to unequivocably say that those images were of ' underage' girls. The fact that they appeared to be underage is the biggest selling point of the images. That is why the vendor/website advertizes them as the following:
PRE-TEEN
GIRLS WITH FARM ANIMALS
FAMILY AFFAIRS
YOUNG LOLITAS
etc....
Now, let me ask you this, anyone. Do you think that if these images REALLY contained underage kids, the Mag vendors, movie vendors, websites, COULD CONTINUE TO SELL THEM, MAKE THEM AVAILABLE TO DOWNLOAD and VIEW from the INTERNET, it that were really the case. Don't you think that our LEO's would have been after them (since this exact stuff has been available for 25 years or more).
Did the public think Westerfield might have taken these pictures himself ?, or gotten them from a source that no one else in the U.S. has?
Sorry to be so graphic, but it is funny, almost, to see how a large section of the FR readership, and the general public can be swayed , and not think of some of the more obvious things.
LIKE, what were the other 63,900 images of, if only 100 were porn?
Were they are related to images of a sexual nature ?
If you got onto a website and downloaded 64000 images of country scenes, they would probably be organized into folders by type, doncha think?
Would that mean (or prove) because they were organized into folders, that YOU were anal-retentive (neat freak)? These are the questions the sheep dare not ask.
Lastly, you pointed out legal ways of selling/producing online porn. Ah, there's also the non-commericial porn files... IE:homemade stuff, black market stuff, free stuff: all of which does not fall under commercial law/business law?...the list can go on and on..right?
What's the dispute? I've missed it. Can you help me find the list of chemicals or whatever it was that was referred to? Was it in the transcripts..I'm too tired to think tonight. Will see ya tomorrow.
This tank is usually in a heated environment to protect it from freezing in winter. (like your garage).
The HTH pills are essentially CHLORINE TABLETS. The pool is supposed to be checked for Chlorine content and PH balance. I suppose you could even use Chlorox Bleach instead of HTH tablets.
You would have a odor of chlorine in your garage NO MATTER WHAT.
Some people and public pools keep Chlorox bleach near the pool with a foot sized pan for each person to step into before entering the pool. THIS IS TO CUT DOWN ON TRANSMITTAL OF ATHLETE'S FOOT to OTHERS ! ! ! ! ! ! !
SORRY, NO SALE ON THIS.
I think, once again, that the police and DA were under the gun to calm the public, assure their re-election, and so they locked on a target and put pieces together even if the parts didn't really fit together correctly. A little glue, tape, and some scissors, and they got them to stick together. The picture is a little distorted, but as long as the public is happy, who cares.
60,000 or more graphic images files on a ZIP DISK found on a bookshelf.
2200 MPEG files, and I don't believe it was specified what was contained in these movie files.
Pictures of his ladyfriend's daughter stored as graphic images on the hard drive of his computer.
During the testimony, if you didn't pay real close attention, you would not have noticed they said this. You could easily assume the Danielle bathing suit image was on the porn zipdisk.
I think you make another point..If the man was addicted to "young girls" or porn in general, He would have had other things in his home. Did they find illegal kiddy porn mag? CD's or tapes. This was a single male. He had no wife to hide sexual material from.
Fresno's swinging posts made me curious enough to go check some out..my goodness they keep popping out at you, opening new windows.. You could end up with tons of stuff on your computer without trying. What else do they have?
Nevertheless, I did go back until I found my post. And in all the testimony that you just posted, please point out to me where it says that all the images they looked at were porn. Quote from the transcripts, if you can find it. They describe what was in the 100 or less images they found questionable, but do not seem to call the rest of the images "porn." People are ass-u-me ing things that aren't in the testimony, unless you can find a direct reference to 67,000 porn images.
WESTERFIELD'S LAWYERS? That's a hoot, Fresno! These reporters have, themselves, printed these "hints" in various newspaper articles--you've posted some just yesterday! So now they're pulling a "Kimmee" and blaming the lawyers? Oh, that's sad.
...almost makes ya wonder how many of these reporters belong to the CB Swing Club....
Good standup material, Kim. Trying out for the Comedy Club? Every time someone mentioned they were swingers, you started screeching "rumor!" Guess what? Some rumors are true. Especially a "rumor with legs" like this one, and, to use a subject people on Free Republic know all too well, consider the stained blue dress "rumor" from a couple years back.
Kim, pretty please, READ THE BLEEPIN' TRANSCRIPTS? It says no such thing. It says less than 100 of the images were questionable. It says NONE of the images were child porn. Sheesh.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.