Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Appoints Four More Homosexual Activists
Culture and Family Institute ^ | Peter J. LaBarbera

Posted on 04/11/2002 2:33:55 PM PDT by BobRJones

Bush Appoints Four More Homosexual Activists

President Bush has appointed four more Republican homosexual activists to posts in his administration, a homosexual newspaper reports.

The four men are all active with the Republican “gay” activist group Log Cabin Republicans, according to the Washington Blade. They are, according to the Blade:

Asian affairs expert Mark Groombridge as a State Department special assistant to John Bolton, Under Secretary for Arms Control and International Security. Groombridge — a member of Log Cabin Republicans of D.C., and the homosexual libertarian group Gays & Lesbians for Individual Liberties — is a China specialist whose doctoral dissertation “examined the restructuring of China’s state-owned enterprises,” the Blade reported; Stephen Fong, former president of Log Cabin Republicans of San Francisco, to a post with the Federal Transit Administration, an arm of the Department of Transportation; Tod Burnett and Jim Wiggins to positions at the Environmental Protection Agency. Burnett is a former advisor to liberal Republican and former Los Angeles mayor Richard Riordan. The Blade reports that the White House did not mention the homosexuality of the latest four in officially announcing their appointments by the president.

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer has said that a person’s “sexual orientation” is irrelevant as long as he has the job qualifications for a position. But pro-family critics contend that the administration is pandering to homosexual activist Republicans and thus helping to “mainstream” homosexuality. Ironically, the Log Cabin Republicans strongly supported John McCain, and not Bush, during the GOP presidential primary, and even ran campaign ads against Bush.

Bush senior advisor Karl Rove is engaged in a political tightrope act — reaching out simultaneously to GOP homosexual activists and to the party’s conservative, pro-family grassroots, who oppose homosexuality as sinful.

Rove’s high-wire act may be getting more perilous. The Blade reports that homosexual columnist Hastings Wyman (who first reported the four “gay” appointments), citing Republican sources, says that “at least 15 more gay appointees are either in the Bush administration pipeline or are ‘slowly working their way out of the closet.’”

— Peter J. LaBarbera Culture and Family Institute http://cultureandfamily.org/report/2002-04-03/n_bush.shtml


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: appointments; bush; gays; homosexual
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201 next last
To: RAT Patrol
We all know they are gay don't we. That's the same as wearing a sign.

I didnt know until you told me. And if I saw them tomorrow I wouldnt know them from a hole in the ground. You say its the same as wearing a sign. Are you telling me that you are like the kid in The Sixth Sense who saw dead people but you see queer people. Wow, have you sold the movie rights?

121 posted on 04/11/2002 7:26:54 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill
There you go. They even admit it. Homosexuals love George W. He advances their AGENDA.

Gee, I bet you still believe what you hear on CNN too.

122 posted on 04/11/2002 7:29:33 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: JCG
It isn't about "who they share their beds with." It's about their "Gay Pride" parades, their attacks on the Boy Scouts of America, their "fisting" seminars for Massachusetts junior high schoolers, their NAMBLA-inspired murder of Jeffrey Curley, their Rosie O'Donnell child adoption schemes and their numerous other assaults on our American culture.

And you KNOW most, if not all, Log Cabin Republicans participate in and support these activities? Remember now, God says you shall not bear false witness.

123 posted on 04/11/2002 7:41:14 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: log_cabin_gop_boy
For a Log Cabin Republican you sure do have a boring home page.
124 posted on 04/11/2002 7:47:08 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
And a lot of you Call Bush Moral?

I thought you were a Bush-Bot? Didn't you jump all over me a couple of weeks ago for calling him Bubba-2?

BTW,Bubba-2 is right to hire these people IF he thinks they are fully qualified to hold those positions. It's not like they are priests or preachers. OOOPS!

125 posted on 04/11/2002 7:51:10 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
Most people would not know, that is not true, the Queers themselves put the reported article out. You got your head in the sand.

Again, I dont read gay newpapers but apparently you do.

126 posted on 04/11/2002 7:51:34 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
In that case the goal is to normalize immorality.

How is this normalizing homosexuality in any way? These people will dissapear into the woodwork,and never seen again by the public once they start work. None are high-profile public positions.

BTW,has Bubba-2 replaced the homosexual ambassador to Belgium? If not,why not? THAT was something worthy of all the negative attention,not some dweeb or geek being hired to shuffle papers in some bureaucracy.

127 posted on 04/11/2002 7:55:22 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
How is this normalizing homosexuality in any way? These people will dissapear into the woodwork,and never seen again by the public once they start work. None are high-profile public positions.

Yeah right ... this was precisely the line taken by those who sought appease with "co-existence" the homosexual activists within the Catholic Church 40 years ago.

128 posted on 04/11/2002 7:57:20 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Lithasis
Once a person openly embraces their so called lifestyle they become TRAITORS AND MORTAL ENEMIES of the human race.

Just in case nobody has ever told you this,you are insane.

129 posted on 04/11/2002 7:59:02 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
Remember now, God says you shall not bear false witness.

They apparently are referred to as homosexual 'activists' which means they're doing something more than just being quietly homosexual and keeping their sex lives to themselves. I'm fairly tolerant of gays I think ---if they just keep that aspect of their lives to themselves. If they are "in your face" about it and working on their own agenda then I think we can have an opinion.

130 posted on 04/11/2002 7:59:18 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
Yeah right ... this was precisely the line taken by those who sought appease with "co-existence" the homosexual activists within the Catholic Church 40 years ago

There has always been homosexual priests. The only thing is nobody would admit to or talk about it 40 years ago.

131 posted on 04/11/2002 8:05:05 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Oh come on ... the difference was that it wasn't "normalized". These days in AmChurch, you're probably at a greater risk for being rejected at seminary if you take the traditional approach to homosexuality (a disordered and immoral act) than if you're a radical fairy.

Given the increasing reliance on a battery of "psychological" tests (rather than recognition of one's comporting to and defense of Catholic teaching), you don't think the 'normalizing' of homosexuality by the DSM-IV as other than a disorder?

There's always been premarital sex and those who chose birth control among Catholics as well. The difference was that these things weren't "normalized" before the revolution but rightly and consistently recognized as immoral.

132 posted on 04/11/2002 8:17:43 PM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Lithasis
"Lets get somthing straight once and for all. Sodomites ARE ...NOT...HUMANS! Once a person openly embraces their so called lifestyle they become TRAITORS AND MORTAL ENEMIES of the human race." What kind of demented, sci-fi, ultra-orthodox, perverted, bedwetting, haploid, mouth-breathing "home" did you grow up in??!! Gays are not PEOPLE!!?? Do the world a favor and shoot yourself in the mouth as soon as possible. You are taking up my air. Oh. I'm sorry....was that too much?
133 posted on 04/11/2002 8:21:59 PM PDT by PrescottBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Re #75, no mortal has perfect doctrine but that lack does not undo salvation through faith in Christ Jesus the Lord (my Lord and Savior). If our salvation hung on our perfection of doctrine, we'd all be damned right now because God Himself has not yet brought us into the promised unity of the faith. President Bush says he has accepted Jesus Christ as his Savior. The world (including me) will not like or bow to every decision he makes, nor should it. That does not change the fact that he has asked God to forgive him, a sinner, and accept his person into His presence now and eternally, through faith in Christ. "For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." (Romans 6:23) In Romans 5:15-18, salvation is identified as a "free gift" three times. When I receive something that is free, I can't alter the giving by what I do after receiving it, other than by subsequently rejecting that gift. Bush is saved. And unless he recants that faith, he will meet the other redeemed souls in heaven. I bless and honor his imperfect name and his righteous decisions, and pray for him where he may miss the mark. He is a fellow heir of the grace of God, and I am very grateful he is my president during these incredibly difficult and challenging times.
134 posted on 04/11/2002 8:36:33 PM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: BobRJones
It's cool to have a few queers running around the office - they're on all the sitcoms.
135 posted on 04/11/2002 8:50:34 PM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
The men are appointed to all economic positions.

To be honest, as long as they are good at their jobs, I don't care what their sexual orientation is. I just dont want to have to approve of it.

Bush is the President of all Americans, not just the born-again Christians. Let me ask this: must Bush only appoint heterosexuals in a monogamous married relationship? Fornication and adultery are just as evil as homosexuality (though I will grant that homosexuality disgusts me far more). Divorce aint cool either.

This is a civil, secular society, not the church. We cannot expect to impose our beliefs upon a society that hates them. We can only work to change the hearts of men through evangelism.

136 posted on 04/11/2002 8:51:00 PM PDT by jude24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
Yeah, I am sure all the women in the administration will think they are really cute and amusing.
137 posted on 04/11/2002 8:52:19 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: jude24
I have no opposition to the appointment of men that are the best qualified to do the job and they just happen to be gay. I do object if it is a pandering attempt to get votes or woo the Sodomy vote.

I do have a problem if as it is noted above that this is meant to indicate the approval of the President for a Homosexual agenda.If this were NOT simply a political pander the WH would never have leaked that they were homosexual.. This was an intentional choice , if this was Clinton the crys would be loud an clear..But this President hears barely a wimper from the Kool aide crowd.

138 posted on 04/11/2002 9:00:17 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Pander to the sodomite vote? Let's see; Popular opinion is that 10% of the general public is homosexual. That would be a constituency worth pandering to....if you were a liberal dog. Most Conservatives argue that it is far lower than that, 2-3%. But, GW is pandering to the sodomite vote? GW would never risk offending the Conservatives who elected him just to peel off a tiny percentage of a tiny percentage of folks who will never vote for him anyway. So which is it....a higher percentage of gay voters, OR GW possibly hiring the best individuals for the job?
139 posted on 04/11/2002 9:15:28 PM PDT by PrescottBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: gcruse;UncleBill;RnMomof7;babylonian
What do these links have to do with hiring practices of the Bush administration?

I would bet you do not have children in public schools.

If you did, you'd understand why parents are appalled at the smug, pervasive, destructive homosexual agenda that permeates every moment of the school day.

It's bad enough that Washington's tentacles reach down to my kid's playground, without me having to worry those tentacles are lurking in the bushes as well as the classroom.

140 posted on 04/11/2002 9:18:26 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson