Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH'S REAL OPPOSITION: REPUBLICAN CONSERVATIVES
news/op/ed ^ | 3/28/2002 | Richard Reeves

Posted on 03/29/2002 3:08:59 PM PST by TLBSHOW

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820821-834 last
To: seamole
Why don't y'all just stay at the FAB and FRN forums and play there?

As you are well aware, if I was able to access the FAB forum, you wouldn't still be a member of FR. I have not accessed the FRN site, except for a glance in over half a month.

821 posted on 03/30/2002 8:48:58 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 813 | View Replies]

To: vbmoneyspender
And I stand by the GOVERNMENT TAX FORM of 1913 that says that there is no such rate as is quoted on two of your sources. So I suggest that we get to the bottom of this and find out what happened. Reagan isn't wrong. Obviously, there is something in the tax charts that says that there was a tax rate of 50% in 1986 too. So rather than go round and round, let's get a solution. How about coming up with the Economic Recovery Act LAW of 1982 itself??

Come on, it is common sense: if there was no tax cut until 1986, there would have been no recovery. Use your head---you know that isn't right. So there is some glitch on these forms that we aren't seeing.

822 posted on 03/31/2002 5:27:58 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 816 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
So we agree. You are confused.
823 posted on 03/31/2002 5:28:48 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 812 | View Replies]

To: LS
So we agree. You are confused.

What? Have I reduced you to making "one-liners" now? Is that all you have left in your arsenal?

824 posted on 03/31/2002 7:25:54 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 823 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
My arsenal remains full. But wasting ammo on dead bodies is uesless.
825 posted on 03/31/2002 8:30:04 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 824 | View Replies]

To: LS
My arsenal remains full.

Yes, of confused democRAT notions.

The notion that the Clinton administration and DNC committed all sorts of horrible crimes but we should just "move on". The notion that Republicans can gain long term political advantage by having Bush violate his oath of office and ignore credible evidence of serious crimes like election tampering, blackmail of politicians and murder ... thus empowering democRATS to further commit further crimes. The notion that the GOP can win by FEARING the media, the courts and even what democRAT voters might think. The notion that voters can decide what they want without knowing the facts.

826 posted on 03/31/2002 8:39:50 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 825 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
Yep. Dang them stupid voters. Don't have sense enough to watch FOX. That must be why its share is increasing.
827 posted on 03/31/2002 11:57:05 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 826 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
This Country meant something to our founding fathers .. obviously it doesn't mean the same to you that you would even consider splitting up the country

Indeed it did mean something to them. So much so that they were willing to fight for it.

Freedom isn't going to return to us by some process of osmosis. It has to be fought for. Sooner or later.

828 posted on 03/31/2002 1:27:07 PM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 725 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Redemption time for President Bush. Make voter fraud as big an issue as campaign finance reform. I can't for the life of me understand why CFR was more important than voter fraud. A fraudulent vote cancels a legitimate vote. It is bad enough that American citizens are willing to sell their vote but intolerable that illegals can vote and neither group has reprecusions. Voter ID has got to be the law of the land. Throw conservatives a bone Mr. President---You will be the big beneficiary if the dead and other inelegibles are rousted from the election process.
829 posted on 03/31/2002 2:24:09 PM PST by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Just out of curiousity, how much soft money do you contribute to political organizations during each election cycle?

Soft money isn't the beef, and if you've been following the threads about CFR you would know this. It's about the 60 day moritorium on ads placed by grass-roots organizations. While hard money can be used, third parties are silenced. So, money you send to the NRA or the Sierra Club to get out the message are useless. That's the unconstitutional portion, and I'm hoping/betting the SCOTUS rules it unconstitutional.

830 posted on 03/31/2002 4:03:34 PM PST by cidrasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 411 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
"But in the end, Nixon kept them in line by pushing the war in Vietnam beyond reasonable limits. George Bush could accomplish the same political goal of uniting conservative support by continuing to push the war on terrorism into far nooks and crannies of the whole world."

I had not read anything by Reeves in a while but after looking at this one, it's reassuring to know that he is as big a jackass as always.
831 posted on 03/31/2002 6:08:43 PM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Indeed it did mean something to them. So much so that they were willing to fight for it.
Freedom isn't going to return to us by some process of osmosis. It has to be fought for. Sooner or later

So what are you saying ... we should bare arms against fellow american?? .. we show start another civil war???

Oh yea .. that will just solve our problems ..

Great idea ... NOT!!!

832 posted on 03/31/2002 8:49:54 PM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 828 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I was hoping that my statement would be taken with a dose of common sense. Hopefully I wasn't hoping in vain.

(Hint: the right tools for the right job)

833 posted on 04/01/2002 5:11:55 AM PST by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 832 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I agree. We cannot give Democrats the options of chosing a leader. It is about not letting the Dems chose, not about chosing someone, unfortunately. I'd rather have someone on the right than on the left. Jurisdiction of the poor is plain terrorism.
834 posted on 04/01/2002 5:17:36 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 761-780781-800801-820821-834 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson