Replies

We just need a candidate that can draw enough Republican votes away from Bush if he goes through with this plan. There will always be Bushites who will support him no matter what. But there are enough people upset enough about his immigration policy to swing an election.

There is NO doubt that 3rd parties can swing an election and if that is the goal sure you may be able to do it, but then the outcome goes to the Democrats for and at least 4 years and probably 8. Is that an acceptable outcome for you? I am making no judgements just asking if you are so mad at Bush that you are willing to give the country back to the Dems.

At this point I don't see any real difference between Bush and a Democrat.

There is NO doubt that 3rd parties can swing an election and if that is the goal sure you may be able to do it, but then the outcome goes to the Democrats for and at least 4 years and probably 8. Is that an acceptable outcome for you?

Oh, you can judge me, I don't care. In answer to your question, I don't vote "lesser of 2 evils". I personally vote for someone based on their stance on issues important to me. That is why, earlier in this thread, I did not say necessarily that I would vote for Tom Tancredo since I don't know his stance on some of the other issues important to me. For all I know, he is a gun control freak. I just don't know yet.

I vote my conscience. And illegal immigration is a strong enough issue for me that the candidate whom I vote for must be in lockstep with my feelings on the issue.

....just asking if you are so mad at Bush that you are willing to give the country back to the Dems.

At this point I don't see any real difference between Bush and a Democrat.

I would rather give the country back to the Dems than the Mexicans. At least the Dems speak English. For now anyway!!

...There is NO doubt that 3rd parties can swing an election and if that is the goal sure you may be able to do it, but then the outcome goes to the Democrats for and at least 4 years and probably 8. Is that an acceptable outcome for you? I am making no judgements just asking if you are so mad at Bush that you are willing to give the country back to the Dems."...

Is an outcome where the President ignores what is right for the Country acceptable to you just because said President has an "R" by their name....does the "R" stand for right, as in the correct or proper thing to do?

Last August, I believe was the date, Alan Keyes made a comment about it being easier to see and fight the known enemy (he was talking about the Perverted President)...our eyes are open to 'the other side' doing things whereas when its one us 'ours' running the show, we tend to let our eyes glaze over, or just go out and plant a garden knowing everything is gonna be ok cause our guys doing it.

The last scenario has been running rampant here at FR....