Replies

OK, so you would have no problem with public school science classes also delving into the problems with macro-evolution, and the differences between the various evoltionary schools of thought? They seem to present it as a tidy package, all wrapped up and complete. They never cover the threads that do not connect, but just assume that they will, in time. It is not an exact science, even more in-exact (is that a word?) than human psychology.

At my high school in Louisiana, our Biology class didn't even discuss evolution due to the whining hissy fits the fundies throw over it. And your argument is totally flawed. See here

"And your argument is totally flawed."

Evolution is NOT a complete science, an interesting theory, but not a complete science.
Just saying it is does not make it so, and slamming Christians who do not swallow the WHOLE evolution idea does NOT make you sound any more intelligent.
You have a bone to pick with christianity (yea, it shows), and it goes beyond Creationism vs (macro)Evolution theory.
It is noble for you to enter into discussions with those much older than you, but don't fall into the trap of being "intolerant" of other viewpoints.
People who do not blindly accept the gaps in Evolution theory are not morons - you pigeon-hole us into uneducated, unenlightened buffoons, hanging around the shack like in "Deliverence".
Show a little respect, we are lawyers and surgeons, we design combat aircraft and captain ships. We are Judges, educators, and law-enforcement officers. And Honor Society high-school kids, too.