[Psalm 73]

"I don't see the point of accepting microevolution but denying macroevolution."

Sure, because one takes place within the species, and modifies the existing; and the other creats a whole new species.
The quantity of new information required is just staggering, and where there is proof of the one, there is no witness to a brand new, unique species coming into being.
If we can only believe what we can see and measure, how can you accept the total macro-evolution theory as fact?

[Dimensio]

Sure, because one takes place within the species, and modifies the existing; and the other creats a whole new species. The quantity of new information required is just staggering, and where there is proof of the one, there is no witness to a brand new, unique species coming into being.

Argument from incredulity then?