Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ray Admits There Was Evidence to Prosecute Clinton
NewsMax ^ | 3/7/02 | (UPI)

Posted on 03/06/2002 12:16:47 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

WASHINGTON – Independent counsel Robert Ray released his final report on Bill Clinton’s perjury scandal Wednesday and said there was sufficient evidence to prosecute Clinton. The independent counsel cut a deal with Clinton in January after deciding not to prosecute.

Ray's report, released with the permission of the three-judge panel that appointed him, recounts much of the facts in the investigation into Clinton’s Monica Lewinsky scandal.

In a section on the conclusions reached in the investigation, Ray tries to convey what he sees are the larger implications of Clinton's scandals.

"In the search for meaning from this episode in American history," Ray said in his final Lewinsky report, "two observations of former Watergate special prosecutor Leon Jaworski have special resonance: 'From Watergate we have learned what generations before us have known: Our Constitution works.' And as Jaworski said, we have reaffirmed the principle and the spirit of the law that 'no one is above the law.'

"A generation later, let it be said here."

Ray's office issued a statement along with the report.

"In the independent counsel's judgment, there was sufficient evidence to prosecute President Clinton for violating federal criminal laws within this office's jurisdiction," the statement said. "Nonetheless, the independent counsel concluded, consistent with the Principles of Federal Prosecution, that further proceedings against President Clinton for his conduct should not be initiated."

Clinton’s Sweet Deal

By agreeing in January to publicly admit he gave "misleading and evasive" testimony in the Paula Jones case about his sexual relationship with Lewinsky, a former White House intern, and agreeing to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license, Clinton avoided what might have been years in court, and millions more dollars added to his multimillion-dollar legal expenses.

Clinton also agreed not to seek reimbursement of attorneys' fees, something that only a special three-judge panel could have granted in an independent counsel's probe.

That panel gave Ray permission to release the final Lewinsky report Wednesday.

By agreeing to drop any possible prosecution against the president, Ray avoided what might have been years in court on a case that Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said he couldn't win.

In defending Ray's decision not to seek prosecution, his office said Wednesday that judgment was supported by:

"(1) President Clinton's admission of providing false testimony that was knowingly misleading, evasive, and prejudicial to the administration of justice before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas;

"(2) his acknowledgement that his conduct violated the Rules of Professional Conduct of the Arkansas Supreme Court;

"(3) the five-year suspension of his license to practice law and $25,000 fine imposed on him by the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas;

"(4) the civil contempt penalty of more than $90,000 imposed on President Clinton by the federal court for violating its orders; "(5) the payment of more than $850,000 in settlement to Paula Jones;

’Contemptuous Conduct’

"(6) the express finding by the federal court that President Clinton had engaged in contemptuous conduct; and

"(7) the substantial public condemnation of President Clinton arising from his impeachment."

The office statement complained about its treatment by Clinton and others.

Obstruction

"Over the course of this investigation, this office faced numerous challenges to its professional integrity and the lawful exercise of its authority," the statement said. "These allegations of professional and other misconduct and the claims of a right to withhold evidence ultimately were rejected. These allegations and other tactics had a substantial impact on the prompt completion of this office's work, delaying in some cases for months access to available evidence.

"Responding to these allegations and claims also increased substantially the expense of this investigation" - the taxpayers’ final tab for the probe of Clinton’s misconduct will be $70 million, the office said in a footnote - "but it was essential to do so in order for the independent counsel to fulfill the mandates sought by the attorney general and conferred by the Special Division (the three judges panel)."

Be Careful What You Wish For

In 1994, Clinton and then-Attorney General Janet Reno pushed hard for congressional re-enactment of the Independent Counsel Act, over the opposition of Republicans led by then-Sen. Robert Dole, R-Kan.

Clinton and Reno said they were convinced an independent counsel would clear him quickly of any impropriety in an Arkansas land deal popularly known as "Whitewater," and do so in a manner that had credibility.

Instead, the independent counsel's probe stretched on for six years on a variety of matters.

In Wednesday's statement, Ray's office said a final report on Clinton's Arkansas business dealings was filed with the three-judge panel, but that remains under seal.

However, Ray issued his preliminary findings in September 2000, saying there was not enough evidence to accuse the president and Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing in the Whitewater matter.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonscandals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
Send PayPal direct to JimRob@psnw.com

1 posted on 03/06/2002 12:16:47 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Nonetheless, the independent counsel concluded, consistent with the Principles of Federal Prosecution, that further proceedings against President Clinton for his conduct should not be initiated."

Because we now want to teach the important lesson that if you are powerful and well-connected, you are above the law. What a great lesson.

3 posted on 03/06/2002 12:23:09 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A $115,000 in fines is less than his fee for a speech, what a deal.
4 posted on 03/06/2002 12:23:23 PM PST by razorback-bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scruffdog
They can still be charged with treason.
5 posted on 03/06/2002 12:24:12 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scruffdog
What a dickhead this Ray sounds like... "Let it be said here..." .... dork....
6 posted on 03/06/2002 12:25:45 PM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
By whom?
7 posted on 03/06/2002 12:28:30 PM PST by WhiteGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Scruffdog
I don't believe in luck that consistent. It was a great failing of the American public (not to mention the voter) that he was able to ride out what should have been a firestorm followed by removal from office. Much as we grew weary of, then abandoned, the man who faced down the tanks in Tienanmen Square, America couldn't keep up the heat long enough to do the job.
8 posted on 03/06/2002 12:29:47 PM PST by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
Another giant leap down the path to two sets of laws. One set for the "ruling class" and another set for the rest of us.
Good men shed blood and died to prevent this.
9 posted on 03/06/2002 12:30:12 PM PST by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: donh
What is the point in persecuting Enron executives when you were willing to allow Clinton to walk?
10 posted on 03/06/2002 12:30:27 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
And as Jaworski said, we have reaffirmed the principle and the spirit of the law that 'no one is above the law.'

I have trouble seeing how this reaffirms the principle that "no one is above the law".

11 posted on 03/06/2002 12:36:11 PM PST by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Nixon paid dearly for his transgressions. It cost him his job and his dignity. He wasn't prsecuted but was given a pardon. Clinton won. He did not loose anything. He had no dignity to loose, he kept his job and thumbed his nose at everyone.
12 posted on 03/06/2002 12:36:42 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"A generation later, let it be said here."

Whaaaaat?!!!!!!!

The guy sounds like he is trying to imitate one of Clinton's Kennedyesque Speeches...............

"NOW LET US GO FORWARD ON THE BRIDGE TO THE 21st CENTURY..."

13 posted on 03/06/2002 12:37:57 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What is the point in persecuting Enron executives when you were willing to allow Clinton to walk?

What is the point on persecuting anyone if certain select people are above the law? If the law doesn't serve everyone, that it's every man for himself. The law is just another club for powerful thugs to beat you up with, it deserves no more special regard than a gun or a switchblade deserves.

14 posted on 03/06/2002 12:51:02 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"In the independent counsel's judgment, there was sufficient evidence to prosecute President Clinton for violating federal criminal laws within this office's jurisdiction," the statement said.

Then the independent counsel needs his ass kicked and he should return his salary cause he didn't do his job.

15 posted on 03/06/2002 12:57:01 PM PST by sinclair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scruffdog
The legacy just continues to grow.
16 posted on 03/06/2002 12:59:30 PM PST by bfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Ray...said there was sufficient evidence to prosecute Clinton.

Two years ago we could have told you this, and frankly, most if not all Freepers knew that Ray's "Oh, by the way" statement would come out long after anything could be done to Clinton.

One day soon the Washington politicos will realize too late that the American public's anger will boil over, and Republicans and Democrats alike will pay a dear price for their wanton rape and pillage of Joe Sixpack.

17 posted on 03/06/2002 1:03:33 PM PST by Sangamon Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Another giant leap down the path to two sets of laws. One set for the "ruling class" and another set for the rest of us.
Good men shed blood and died to prevent this.

Well said!, sad, but well said.

18 posted on 03/06/2002 1:11:14 PM PST by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
What a loser Ray is! To do all that work, collect all that evidence, and walk away is a waste of time and taxpayers' money and an affront to justice.

Billy Klintoon belongs in jail. His wife does, too.

19 posted on 03/06/2002 1:14:52 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson