Evolution is not goal-oriented. There is no "final desired output". That's why, a number of posts ago, and I'm guessing you simply do not read these posts with comprehension, I stated that software emulating evolution is not like natural selection but more like breeding selection. Even genetic algorithms which try to make the goal open-ended still have to have a function for selection. Such a function does not encompass the open possibilities that life in the natural environment presents.
"Evolution is not goal-oriented. There is no "final desired output". That's why, a number of posts ago, and I'm guessing you simply do not read these posts with comprehension, I stated that software emulating evolution is not like natural selection but more like breeding selection." - Nebullis
Sigh. The final desired output is "life". It does us no good to have DNA self-form naturally (i.e. without intelligent intervention) if it never creates life.
Moreover, we haven't been discussing the limited subset of software that is designed to deliberately emulate evolution, as you imply above, but rather, we've been discussing the fact that human software is analogous to DNA coding.
If there is a problem with reading comprehension or intellectual honesty, then that problem resides with person who made such glaring "errors" that require so many point by point rebuttals from me, as illustrated above, by the way.