Posted on 03/03/2002 7:49:10 AM PST by FresnoDA
CAUSE OF GIRL'S DEATH COULD REMAIN MYSTERY
Police say they may never know how Danielle van Dam died, or when. The seven-year-old girl disappeared from her San Diego home February first. Authorities are now confirming that a child's body found by volunteer searchers Wednesday is that of the missing child. The district attorney says an autopsy performed confirmed her identity yesterday. The identification was made through dental records because of the condition of the body. Medical examiners are trying to determine the cause of death, but Police Chief Dave Bejerano says it's possible that we'll never know how, or when she was killed. A neighbor has been charged with kidnapping and murdering her. Authorities say they found the girl's blood on his clothing and in his motor home. He has pleaded innocent. |
Okay, now I have to ask whether you're joking: You've been married for 31 years [that would probably make you at least 51 years old], and you wear an ankle bracelet when you teach Sunday School? Please tell me I got some of that wrong.
No doubt.
You sir, are a prude! ...:-)
She wasn't a toddler; she was 7 years old. 7 year olds crawl into bed on their own. As far as I'm concerned, the very fact that he would allow her to wear jewelry at the age of 7 is ample evidence of his failure as a father [although I'm also aware that that's not a very popular opinion here at the ostensibly conservative FreeRepublic.com]; the fact that he would allow her to go to sleep without removing her jewelry and bathing herself is even more evidence of his inadequacy.
Actually, I'm 52 and grandmother of three. During the spring and summer I wear my anklet everywhere. I even wear it to my very conservative church.........oh shudder!!!!!
You really have a problem, Slick. A very delicate anklet is a piece of jewelry like any other. Get over it !!!!!
Now, that is just nonsense! Of course they did. They wore brooches and watches on chains and earrings and bracelets and rings when they were dressed up in the day time, and chokers or a ribbon around their necks at night when they went to dances and balls, depending on the gown they were wearing. I own some of that jewlery that has been passed down in my family (dating back to the Civil War) and I have seem plenty of it in pictures. go to a museum some time, and you will see what respectable ladies wore.
And the van Dams had three (3) probably very active kids who were putting a crimp on the evening's possible activities. I personally think that the parents are not capable of murder, but would go to (what we would regard) as great lengths to further their "freedom of expression", and at the same time feel good in the knowledge that they were protecting their child from things that they "weren't old enough" yet to know about.
Some have remarked that it was strange that the kids went to bed so early. When did Danielle's brothers wake up? Has anyone been allowed to ask them that question?
Clearly, if Westerfield had an inkling that this was how the van Dams dealt with their children on "swing-nights", his "opportunity detector" would have gone off-scale.
The only unknown for Westerfield was how to know if Danielle would awaken during the act, for surely that would lead to a surprise that Westerfield would not have expected.
I don't see the van Dams admitting that they medication their child with sleeping potions, because that could open them up to an allegation from the defense that Danielle may have been overdosed.
And the van Dams had three (3) probably very active kids who were putting a crimp on the evening's possible activities. I personally think that the parents are not capable of murder, but would go to (what we would regard) as great lengths to further their "freedom of expression", and at the same time feel good in the knowledge that they were protecting their child from things that they "weren't old enough" yet to know about.
Some have remarked that it was strange that the kids went to bed so early. When did Danielle's brothers wake up? Has anyone been allowed to ask them that question?
Clearly, if Westerfield had an inkling that this was how the van Dams dealt with their children on "swing-nights", his "opportunity detector" would have gone off-scale.
The only unknown for Westerfield was how to know if Danielle would awaken during the act, for surely that would lead to a surprise that Westerfield would not have expected.
I don't see the van Dams admitting that they medication their child with sleeping potions, because that could open them up to an allegation from the defense that Danielle may have been overdosed.
I'm a happily married woman. I wear several necklaces at all times. I wear earrings, but not to bed unless they're posts. I own an ANKLE BRACELET. I even wear, at all times...A GOLD WEDDING BAND. Even when I leave the HOUSE!
A piece of advice from a grandma who has successfuly raised three kids to adulthood: get your priorities straight. A woman wearing an anklet is not unusual.
Now a MAN wearing an ankle bracelet...well, that's a different story.
For the umpteenth time: The problem is not that Danielle may have wanted to dress like a whore, the problem is that her parents allowed her to dress like a whore. [In fairness to poor Danielle, it could have been that she wanted to dress like a nice girl and her parents forced her to dress like a whore, but, since she's dead, we'll never know.]
I figured it to be out of place on a 7 year old and thought that she might be emulating adult behavior. (speculating)
(But I think you may have lost it roughly around the ankle bracelet thing.)
None of us has the FACTS of the case.
For me, speculating helps with the grief over how this heinous thing could have happened to a child!
I understand what you are saying, I am just glad I am not one of those people that thinks just because someone does not feel a need to defend themselves against something that has nothing to do with the cause at hand, espcially when it is based on conjecture or rumor, is guilty. Then again, I am one of those people that thinks that saying to people if you have nothing to hide then you should not worry about being investigated is BS too, it is a little thing that has to do with the Constitution. I personally, prefer to see the evidence, maybe even seek it out if it is possible, and hopefully that is what the inevstigators are doing.
I deny her death was willed by whoever interfered in her life.
Back to the sleeping pills, depending upon what was used, it is highly variable and unpredictable depending upon child's health (any colds or bronchitis?), diet, temperature of room, how tired she was, a HUNDRED things--as to just how many of a sleeping pill might be lethal, or might with pressure of an adult male on top of her be lethal. An amount that previously seemed right might just happen to have put her out of our vale of sin that night.
A friend of mine years ago, who was in his forties at the time and was being medicated for severe pain, just found it took more and more to have any effect...and got to looking forward to Fri nites so he could take more, enough to really sleep etc without impairing job performance next day...A few weeks later one Fri nite--you guessed it, asleep for ever.
Danielle case seems like a Friday night to me!
There was a fake military guy named Deep In The Hurtgen Forest, for one, and who could ever forget the mysterious Eschoir, who purported to be a worker deep in the bowels of the Clinton Administration! Both, eventually outed!
From what I can tell by the pictures, it's one of those plastic stretchy chokers that are popular with elementary school aged girls. It's more like a toy than a piece of jewelry. There are much more serious things to consider about the family life than Crackerjack prizes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.