Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Heartlander
I mean, it’s a darn THEORY isn’t it?

So is the inverse square law for gravitational attraction.

What we have is contemporaneous biological evidence, and layers and layers of fossil evidence. None of which agrees with the silly MYTHICAL stories in the Bible.

I think you should worry more about the MYTHICAL Biblical alternative than the FACT based THEORY of evolution.

7 posted on 02/28/2002 6:53:02 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jlogajan
FACT = IF

Man, here we go again...

10 posted on 02/28/2002 6:55:44 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
FACT based THEORY of evolution.

"patrick henry" links...cartoons!

11 posted on 02/28/2002 6:56:33 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
What we have is contemporaneous biological evidence, and layers and layers of fossil evidence. None of which agrees with the silly MYTHICAL stories in the Bible.

Silly? What is more silly than to believe something came from absolutely nothing? The materials that chemically evolved to create the first living creature with a reproductive system, where did these come from?

Faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. I don't know any who suggest that faith is anything more than faith. According to that faith, we believe that God created all that was, is, and will ever be. But where do those who believe in evolution get off passing along their theory as empirical fact?

Once you believe that a theory is the truth, the game is over. You can either prove it, or you can't.

Lastly, with the amount of dogma that evolutionists spew, evolution really does qualify as a religion. If it weren't none would be so passionate about honoring a theory as fact. The circular reasoning evolutionists use is powerful enough to create the centrifugal force needed with which to uphold the theory. God is 'A' and evolution is 'B.' 'B' is not totally confident in itself, but 'B' is confident enough to state that the existence of 'A' is not real. Post hoc ergo propter hoc anyone? The theory is this, therefore because of this God doesn't exist.

Round and around and around and around. . .

Evolution can't even pass a simple logic test.

21 posted on 02/28/2002 7:17:46 PM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
What we have is contemporaneous biological evidence, and layers and layers of fossil evidence. None of which agrees with the silly MYTHICAL stories in the Bible.

Shessh, the arrogance of those who call themselves evolutionist is appalling

The evolutionary record is hardly conclusive. Every other week another "fossil record" is found that changes the whole evolutionary time table, which in it self has huge holes. Frauds and scams have been exposed for decades and STILL are taught by some educators. The only thing the fossil record actually proves without a doubt is that life existed before man recorded history.

The thing that just galls me to no end is the fact that creationism and evolution are both impossible to prove as fact, yet when presented with scientific data for intelligent design models, we are treated as mental midgets, religious fools, stupid ignoramus that can not comprehend the great and mighty weight of evolution, for when examined for what it really is, It is still just a THEORY, and in some peoples mind, some a lot better one than mine, a theory full of a lot of unanswerable questions.

Concerning the Bible and it'd silly MYTHICAL stories. Well many of those "stories" have in fact been proven archeological to be true. The Bible said it happened this way and the archeological record confirms it. Now that is not the whole Bible, but the Bible has a lot better record than evolution when it comes to actually having the facts provable and correct.

End Rant

29 posted on 02/28/2002 7:28:05 PM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
JimRob just got after me for "bashing" religion. What you have said passed anything I said about a certain religion which was highlighted in a recent International sports gala. Their members got all worked up and got the thread pulled.

Here is what he said, when asked for clarification:

"Just don't want people bashing each other because of their religion or bashing the religion itself. "
Jim

It's his forum, and you can thank some of the 11 million for lowering the bar of sensitivity, but fair is fair. God help me if I find a Mormon bashing Islam for pork, virgins, or Allah.

50 posted on 02/28/2002 8:02:49 PM PST by Orion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
"What we have is contemporaneous biological evidence, and layers and layers of fossil evidence. None of which agrees with the silly MYTHICAL stories in the Bible."

Actually, the article "New Out-of -Africa Theory Unvieled" recently posted on FR postulates that all human DNA can be traced back to a single mother. This confirms, per your logic, that the biblical story of Eve is fact based.

Chew on that for a while.

Furthermore, archeological records have always confirmed the veracity of bibilcal histories. None discovered to date have conclusively, or even come close, to proving the Bible to be errant, even those going all the back to Abraham, c 2500 BC, the actual dawn of recorded history. Once again, per your logic, this is fact and not myth.

You do yourself a disservice by by mindlessly passing off the Bible so cavalierly. There is demonstrably devine wisdom in it. The inability to recognise wisdom is the definition of a fool.

121 posted on 03/01/2002 3:49:00 AM PST by Pietro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan
I think you should worry more about the MYTHICAL Biblical alternative than the FACT based THEORY of evolution.

Good point. The Bible has more facts backing it up than evolution. I would be worried too.

125 posted on 03/01/2002 5:12:34 AM PST by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: jlogajan

Its that strange kind of story that seems to come down from long ago,..

Two friends having coffee together when something flies by their window

It may be out on their lawn which is why I had to rent half of a playing field

Cause there’s no explaining what your imagination can make you see and feel.

You know it seems like a dream, got me hypnotized

 

I’m back,…

I mean, it’s a darn THEORY isn’t it?

So is the inverse square law for gravitational attraction

So, why do these evolutionist believers continue to use the "theory of gravity", which has provable positions? You can prove it through methods.

It allowed us to go to the moon.

So, the inverse square law for gravitational attraction is a Theory, and yes, it is, but Evolution is a fact?

Evolution is not a fact. We have not seen it happen in the 150 years since it was predicted by a traveler.

I’m still a little bit disgusted by these Creation versus Evolution threads. Evos use "intelligent design" or "punctuated equilibrium" to defend their position. Some pretend that they know how life on earth formed and came to the current situation.

I suggest that we do not know. Evolution has not been verified in the real world. You cannot predict, based upon this theory, what will happen to a cow or wolf in 2 million years. Millions of species, 150 years, no new ones, unless you count the ones we hadn’t found before.

Creation has not been verified either. There is no way to know for certain.

I am a skeptic. And I believe this discussion is without value.

229 posted on 03/01/2002 6:44:15 PM PST by mjf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson