Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I’m tired of these atheists’ knocking on my door holding the Book of Darwin
Heartlander

Posted on 02/28/2002 6:35:58 PM PST by Heartlander

I’m tired of these atheists’ knocking on my door holding the Book of Darwin

The THEORY of evolution. Hey, Nice THEORY! No, really – a beautiful story about how man might have been created. The Darwin bible though has been interpreted by many to ‘soot’ their own beliefs. They preach this stuff as it were fact and leave out the most important word of any THEORY - the word ‘IF’.

I mean you never hear them say, “IF’ the Evolution of life on earth proceeded in two stages: chemical and biological. Life on earth must have developed from inorganic materials- what else was there for it to come from? The first stage in the development of life, therefore, was the production of a reproducing cell from materials at hand on the early earth. This process is called chemical evolution.... Once a living, reproducing system was present, the process of natural selection took over to produce the wide variety of life that exists today. This from the gospel of evolution.

They state this mumbo jumbo as if it were fact. They always leave out ‘IF’. I mean, it’s a darn THEORY isn’t it? Heck, they even ridicule those who believe otherwise. They hide behind this so called faith in Darwin. Although Darwin was just a prophet of ‘their’ science.

Hey, don’t get me wrong, I appreciate science. I even think that evolution is an interesting THEORY – but why should we preach about Darwin in our schools. I mean evolution is thoroughly compatible with religion-when the object of worship is evolution; and we must keep a separation between religion and state. It doesn’t say that in the Constitution, but hey, it sounds like a darn good idea!

Don’t get me wrong, some evolutionists are starting to understand Intelligent Design. But there is still a majority that thinks evolution has somehow disproved the existence of God. Wow, even their prophets Darwin and Nietzsche understood the dangers that posed.

I am an American and believe that everyone should worship as they chose, but keep your Darwin propaganda out of my child’s school and my country’s laws. It's like some kind of ACLU / 700 club.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-242 next last
To: mlo
group of facts or phenomena, especially one...that is widely accepted.

Ohh, That's good. Follow the masses?

61 posted on 02/28/2002 8:10:00 PM PST by lockeliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
The point is the elimination of God

When did that happen? I studied both science and philosophy, I still have God.

62 posted on 02/28/2002 8:10:11 PM PST by CapandBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: CapandBall
Where would "Intelligent design theories" fit? Science, philosophy, in between or somewhere else alltogeather?

Science of course, where it belongs.

Within twenty years "Intelligent design theories" will be taught along side of "evolutionary theories" as a matter of a complete education

I know you have a problem seeing it as science because of your bias, but evolution went though the same process. What did it take, almost sixty years.?

63 posted on 02/28/2002 8:11:04 PM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: lockeliberty
Ohh, That's good. Follow the masses?

No, you are missing the point. The point is "theory" does not mean unproven. Even an accepted explanation is still a theory.

64 posted on 02/28/2002 8:12:16 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
What? Ok fine, whatever, better decrease your dose a little bit, either that or increase it.
65 posted on 02/28/2002 8:13:01 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
ROLFMAO!!! Got that right!! oh please bring them into this, OH PLEASE!!! It will get REAL FUN!!

It's actually a tad late tonite for most of them, I suspect, but they'll probably give this thread a look-see in the AM. The real shame of it is that these are the same arguments that have been dealt with dozens of times on earlier threads. The posters change; but the arguments remain constant.

66 posted on 02/28/2002 8:13:10 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mlo
The definition I found was defined by man – who defined yours – why was your definition better?
67 posted on 02/28/2002 8:13:39 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
Well, if there are facts to back up "Intelligent" design, then I will be interested in seeing them, but until it is widely accepted by the scientific community, it belongs in philosophy, just as creationism does.
68 posted on 02/28/2002 8:15:35 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
The definition I found was defined by man – who defined yours – why was your definition better?

What are you talking about? It's a word, of course it's defined by man!

You didn't understand what the word means. A "theory" can be true and still be a theory. You tried to use the word "theory" as an argument, and it was wrong. Face it and move on.

69 posted on 02/28/2002 8:16:25 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
Science of course, where it belongs.

Cool, what kind of experiments are being conducted? What new discoveries are on the horizon? What engineering applications do you for see?

Within twenty years "Intelligent design theories" will be taught along side of "evolutionary theories" as a matter of a complete education

I know you have a problem seeing it as science because of your bias, but evolution went though the same process. What did it take, almost sixty years.?

You confuse me with someone else. I know nothing of "Intelligent design theories".

70 posted on 02/28/2002 8:19:59 PM PST by CapandBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Heartlander
I must pack for a trip to Florida for a chili cook-off - I will check back

God bless you all!

71 posted on 02/28/2002 8:20:08 PM PST by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
37,500 web pages about intelligent design in .05 seconds
72 posted on 02/28/2002 8:20:15 PM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: CapandBall
Cool, what kind of experiments are being conducted? What new discoveries are on the horizon? What engineering applications do you for see?

I could ask the same questions for evolution.

73 posted on 02/28/2002 8:22:42 PM PST by JZoback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JZoback
And 849,000 sites for the Theory of evolution, and your point is?
74 posted on 02/28/2002 8:27:44 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: JZoback
My apologies, 1,200,000 sites found, and your point is?
76 posted on 02/28/2002 8:29:49 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

Comment #77 Removed by Moderator

To: JZoback
I could ask the same questions for evolution.

Evolution is a theory based on biology, chemistry, geology. They are based on physics and math. I believe that lots of medicine and virology is based on theorys of evolution. Animal husbandry, nutrition, etc.

78 posted on 02/28/2002 8:31:45 PM PST by CapandBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
And 849,000 sites for the Theory of evolution, and your point is?

The relevant question is to ask for a simple dozen articles on ID written in mainstream refereed science Journals. No one has ever met that challenge, for the simple reason that ID isn't yet to the stage where it meets the criteria for being a scientific theory.

79 posted on 02/28/2002 8:31:51 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Goldhammer
Darwinism and Evolution are related, but only as a tadpole is related to a frog. Darwinism and Evolution are so far apart at this point to call them the same theory is a bold faced lie.

Sorry, TRY AGAIN!!
80 posted on 02/28/2002 8:32:32 PM PST by Aric2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson