Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ohioan
Well, isn't that a nice begging of the question?
No. Begging the question is where the "truth of the conclusion is assumed in the premises."

Please get your terms straight.
45 posted on 02/23/2002 2:47:37 PM PST by Asclepius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Asclepius
I wrote: Well, isn't that a nice begging of the question? in response to your suggestion that it was important to cite a place where the UN called for an invalid use of power?

You responded: No. Begging the question is where the "truth of the conclusion is assumed in the premises." Please get your terms straight. Your assumption was that it mattered how the UN saw its own intrusions. That is the unproven assumption.

How those running the UN see their antics, leagally or morally, is no more relevant to the defense of American sovereignty than how Lenin, Hitler and Mao, saw their policies of intrusion into the affairs of others. We do not accept the idea that an intrusive force may define its own intrusions to our detriment.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site

62 posted on 02/25/2002 9:20:02 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson