[Asclepius]

I think that the facts on the UN website fairly refute your charges.

Does the UN website offer a defense of invalid inference? That was my only "charge"--well, it was hardly a charge. It was more like an observation.

[TEXICAN II]

Charge, sir? I wonder not so much at your charge, but more at your purpose. Strange that mindless conspiracy nuts pose such a threat to you. Stranger still that your time is suddenly occupied with cruising these crazy threads, in search of fools who need correcting. Just what is your real purpose here? With all due respect, who asked you to attempt to insult people who gave you none?

[TEXICAN II]

Perhaps some folks have such sensitivities, they should not be exposed to any insult or slander. They should not go out in public, alone, without someone to protect them. They might better stay home & read the New York Times or the Washington Post. That would be safer!

[Ohioan]

Does the UN website offer a defense of invalid inference?

Well, isn't that a nice begging of the question? Did anyone in history, seeking greater power over others, ever characterize his own pursuit as invalid--or for that matter immoral, evil, or anything other than glorious and idealistic?

The U.N., with the full blessing of the loathsome American State Department policy under Dean Rusk, who should have been tried for treason, crossed the line beyond any possible justification, in 1961, when it became the vehicle for forcing the people of Katanga back under the Central Congo Government. It has never since accepted the limitations on its function, as originally sold to the world.

William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site