Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second WTC Plane Travelling Faster
AP ^ | Saturday February 23 9:13 AM ET

Posted on 02/23/2002 10:06:14 AM PST by sixmil

Second WTC Plane Travelling Faster

NEW YORK (AP) - Researchers believe the second hijacked plane to hit the World Trade Center tower was traveling about 100 mph faster than the first, according to a published report.

Investigators are focusing on the speed of the two planes as they seek to explain what caused the south tower to collapse first, even though it was hit later, The New York Times reported Saturday.

Researchers have closely studied videos, sound recordings and radar to estimate how fast the two jetliners were moving. Studies show that both planes were traveling well over the federal limits for altitudes below 10,000 feet, The Times said.

The second plane was flying so fast that it was in danger of breaking up in the air as it approached the south tower, Boeing spokeswoman Liz Verdier told the Times.

``These guys exceeded even the emergency dive speed,'' Verdier said. ``It's off the chart.''

Two studies have analyzed the speed of the planes, one by the Federal Aviation Administration (news - web sites) in consultation with the National Transportation Safety Board (news - web sites) and the other by Eduardo Kausel, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (news - web sites).

Both found that United Airlines Flight 175, which hit the south tower at 9:02 a.m., was traveling significantly faster than American Airlines Flight 11, which hit the north tower at approximately 8:46 a.m.

The government's calculations put the speed of the first plane at 494 mph, and the second at 586 mph. The MIT analysis determined the first plane was traveling 429 mph, and the second 537 mph, The Times said.

The south tower collapsed 56 minutes after the crash. The north tower stood for 102 minutes.

Structural engineers have not determined to what extent the speed of the planes affected how long the buildings stood. They are studying many factors, including the point at which each tower was hit.

The south tower was hit between the 78th and 84th floors, while the north tower was struck between the 94th and 99th floors, meaning more weight bore down on the damaged floors in the south tower, The Times said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 02/23/2002 10:06:14 AM PST by sixmil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sixmil
586mph=871fps; about the speed of a 45ACP round at the muzzle.
2 posted on 02/23/2002 10:17:02 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty
I wonder how fast the notional 707 in the design requirements for the building was supposed to have been flying? I'll bet not anywhere near this fast, as they would not have been thinking about someone deliberately ramming the building at speed, but more like a plane off course upon landing or takeoff, when they would be going about 1/2 to 1/3 as fast. Since the energy involved in the collision is proportional to the square of the speed, and also to the mass/weight of the aircraft, one would think these strikes exceeded the design standard by a factor of 5 to 10, maybe more. The wonder is not that the buildings fell, but rather that they stood long enough for tens of thousands of people to get out before they fell.
3 posted on 02/23/2002 10:36:08 AM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Regading why the second tower fell first, there was some talk on FR months ago about how the tower design engineers never anticipated simultaneous fires. The fire control system in the first tower was able to, at least partially, contain the fires for a time. When the second plane hit and the sprinkler system came on there was too little water in either tower to make any difference.
4 posted on 02/23/2002 10:37:29 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
eerie...saved this one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/520265/posts

5 posted on 02/23/2002 10:45:23 AM PST by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
Ping!

Absolutely... regardless of which plane was traveling faster, the water was just not there for the second tower to keep the steal from melting quicker.

6 posted on 02/23/2002 10:48:11 AM PST by Northern Yankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
The second plane also hit lower, which may have contributed, since there was a greater number of floors above pushing down on the structural steel.
7 posted on 02/23/2002 10:49:52 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I wonder how fast the notional 707 in the design requirements for the building was supposed to have been flying?

There is a 250 kts (288 mph) speed limit for planes flying below 10,000 feet. (Source: FARs § 91.117) Unless designers were expecting really illegal operation, they probably used 300 mph.

ML/NJ

8 posted on 02/23/2002 10:50:51 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
The second plane also hit lower, which may have contributed, since there was a greater number of floors above pushing down on the structural steel
That would so clearly have been the deciding factor that I'm wondering why they are even bothering about speed.

-Eric

9 posted on 02/23/2002 10:52:05 AM PST by E Rocc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
That's right. Write those jerks a speeding ticket, too.

Actually, not a bad idea. Could be auctioned off..

10 posted on 02/23/2002 10:54:54 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
cAN WE FINE THEIR FAMILIES OR ESTATES FOR THEIR HAVING EXCEEDING fEDERAL REGULATIONS FOR SPEED?
11 posted on 02/23/2002 10:55:28 AM PST by Vinomori
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
bump
12 posted on 02/23/2002 10:58:36 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
"The south tower was hit between the 78th and 84th floors, while the north tower was struck between the 94th and 99th floors, meaning more weight bore down on the damaged floors in the south tower...

No matter how fast the planes were travelling, both buildings withstood the impacts. The weight of the structure above the melting steel on the damaged floors determined the timing of the pancaking collapse.

WTC Collapse Engineering Report (PDF Powerpoint Presentation)

13 posted on 02/23/2002 11:06:49 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
At this point, I'm more concerned with the assorted projectiles that enter bin Laden and his buddies - preferably slow and excruciatingly painful.
14 posted on 02/23/2002 11:11:35 AM PST by Young Rhino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
By doing some quick hand calculations: a plane moving at 586 MPH has 5.5 times the kinetic energy of a plane moving at 250 MPH even though the speed of the faster plane is about 2.3 times the speed of the slower plane. (Kinetic Energy = 1/2 * Mass * Velocity^2)
15 posted on 02/23/2002 11:16:22 AM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Studies show that both planes were traveling well over federal limits for altitudes below 10,000 ft.

Amazing observation, I wonder if anyone actually thought that these terrorist cowards cared about federal speed limits below 10,000 ft. For that matter I'm sure the speed limit is even lower in the city..

Were these studies even needed. A speeding jumbo jet, full of highly flammable fuel crashed into a very tall structure. The structure collaspes. Killing 1000's of innocent victims.

No need to waste taxpayer money on dueling studies.

16 posted on 02/23/2002 11:20:36 AM PST by n.y.muggs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter
There was a thread within the last month (probably week) about a couple of individuals who had been doing some plumbing/sprinkler work in the WTC the week before 9/11. Let me know if you need it; a quick search didn't turn up anything.
17 posted on 02/23/2002 11:23:17 AM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc; txculprit
The second plane also hit lower, which may have contributed, since there
was a greater number of floors above pushing down on the structural steel

That would so clearly have been the deciding factor that I'm wondering why they are even bothering about speed.

Well, I'm not an engineer, but that's certainly my take on it.

18 posted on 02/23/2002 11:24:24 AM PST by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sixmil
Studies show that both planes were traveling well over the federal limits for altitudes below 10,000 feet, The Times said.

That settles it. We'll have to lower the speed limit for airliners travelling below 10,000 feet over populated areas.

19 posted on 02/23/2002 11:25:25 AM PST by LJLucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E Rocc
... I'm wondering why they are even bothering about speed.

Cause people that know the math formula to do that kind of calculation like to do it to make those of us that don't "got math?" wish we would have listened during our high school math classes.

hehee

20 posted on 02/23/2002 11:30:03 AM PST by zeaal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson