[Mortimer Snavely]

Have you read the article that tops this thread? Do you doubt its veracity? If so, why? If you don't doubt it, why do you not feel the least bit of embarrassment? Does it not cause the slightest bit of brow scratching, or even a thoughty "Hmmmmm...?"

[catpuppy]

Yes. Yes. Because. Not applicable. No.

[catpuppy]

If you read the court case you will find that the Bush Administration was correct:

In sum, the district court correctly dismissed Hall's Fifth Amendment Bivens and 42 U.S.C.A. S 1985(1) claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because they are barred by the CSRA. In other words, the courts agreed that Hall's claims did not belong in court. That hardly justifys the shrill outbursts heard on this forum implying that the President shipped bags of dollars to Clinton's attorneys. But some folks grasp at every straw .........