[Vercingetorix]

I concede to the impenetrable intransigence of your faulty intellect. You haven't understood anything I've told you because you don't know enough basic biology. Everything I've told you is true for reasons that you obviously can't begin to comprehend. I have disproved your primary position several times but you didn't even grasp the significance of the proof. I'll say this one more time and leave it at that -- there is no Supernatural Intelligent Designer of DNA sequences. Not now and not ever. Here please note that I am not speaking of men (a misconception that pops up in your posts on occasion).

[Southack]

"I have disproved your primary position several times but you didn't even grasp the significance of the proof. I'll say this one more time and leave it at that -- there is no Supernatural Intelligent Designer of DNA sequences."

Actually, you haven't offered proof of that claim per se. DNA could have been designed by an intelligent force, or DNA could have self-formed from natural, unintelligent processes, but from your presentations to date we see no proof of either (and without such proof, one can't make valid claims of either being the correct explanation).

On the other hand, we do know that computer programs are designed by intelligent forces. We also know that computer programs are the only known phenomenon in the universe that match DNA's characteristics of storing data, processing data, and replicating.

Even more convincingly, we know for a fact that intelligent forces such as Man can reprogram DNA via gene-splicing.

Thus, the scientific mind can view the evidence at hand and readily see which of the two possibilities has the most supporting evidence.