The only thing I can figure is Southack is an account by committee, or he's suffering from completely memory loss, otherwise he would not be whinging about a discussion
that he is still currently participating in on this subject on another thread.
Exhibit #442.
Exhibit #562
Whatever.
"I don't know that he has properly estimated the number of instances of "monkeys" in the universe, however. What is the current estimate of the Drake equation, for example? I also do not accept other parts of the document, but that will have to wait until I get home from work to explain fully." - ThinkPlease" Nice dodge, but you still haven't explained (on any thread) why you disagree with Watson's estimate on the quantity of monkeys. Nor have you explained any other area of Watson's math document that you supposedly disagree with.
More time passes...
Still waiting...