Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In search of extra dimensions: Hang on -- a new reality may be around the corner
spaceref.com ^ | 19 Feb 02 | Press Release

Posted on 02/19/2002 9:19:22 AM PST by RightWhale

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=7456

PRESS RELEASE

Date Released: Monday, February 18, 2002

American Association for the Advancement of Science

In search of extra dimensions: Hang on -- a new reality may be around the corner

BOSTON, MASS. -- "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a persistent one," according to the late Albert Einstein. But, "if everything is an illusion and nothing exists," humorist Woody Allen has observed, "I definitely overpaid for my carpet."

Hang onto your carpet receipts:

Our understanding of reality -- that is, a world where events happen over time within a three-dimensional space -- may be turned on its head by the year 2005, scientist Maria Spiropulu said today during the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Annual Meeting.

"The way we think about things is about to change completely," said Spiropulu. "This is truly a revolution in the way we understand our world."

Spiropulu, a 32-year-old scientist with the Enrico Fermi Institute at the University of Chicago, is hot on the trail of extra dimensions. She's using new methods to prove, experimentally, whether our reality is more complicated than we previously assumed.

"We are very close" to a new reality, she said. "Right now, we imagine space and time as a static question, and we solve equations as a function of space and time. But, what we're learning is that, at the very large scale or the very small scale, space and time are dynamic. What is happening at those scales, we cannot explain. So we have to wonder, do these scales hold some extra dimensions?"

Traditionally, physicists have mathematically explained all that happens in the world by using a "standard model." In this system, all matter is made of lightweight "leptons" (such as electrons and neutrinos) and quarks. Three forces manipulate these particles: electromagnetism, and strong and weak nuclear reactions.

But, this traditional approach doesn't explain gravity, the fourth force. The conventional rules of quantum mechanics have been successfully married with Einstein's Theory of Special Relativity, which explains the behavior of very fast objects -- but not with his Theory of General Relativity, the guidebook to gravitational force. Mathematical gobbledygook usually results from trying to combine quantum mechanics and general relativity. Consequently, we still don't know, for example, what happens to particles sucked into a black hole.

In an effort to uniformly explain all events, physicist Gunnar Nordstrom (1881-1923) first introduced the notion of an extra dimension at the beginning of the 20th century. Perhaps, he thought, gravity happens in a realm we don't understand and can't mathematically define. Some 10 years later, Theodor Kaluza (1885-1954) and Oskar Klein (1894-1977) took Nordstrom's ideas another step forward: An extra dimension may be curled up like an unimaginably small ball, they said, on the order of the Planck scale -- the smallest unit of length in the universe (10 to the minus 33 centimeters).

The idea of an extra dimension was resurrected yet again in the late 1990s, as scientists began to ask whether Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation reliably predicts gravity's behavior below the centimeter scale, Spiropulu explained. Physicists were energized in 1997 by the discovery of possible links between the standard model and "superstring theory" -- the notion that a series of extremely tiny, vibrating strings may lurk beneath the level of quarks and leptons.

Researchers Nima Arkani-Hamed, Savas Dimopoulos, and Gia Dvali then caused further excitement, by suggesting that at least one of these tiny dimensions might, in fact, be large enough to measure. Still, no one has produced undeniable proof of superstrings, and many questions persist.

Since then, Spiropulu reported to AAAS attendees, experiments have shown that Newton's Law is valid down to the 200-micron level. That is, gravity "follows the rules" at that scale. But, the physical reality below this level remains a mystery. Somewhere within the Planck scale, or at extreme energy levels, an incredibly small extra dimension may finally combine gravity and electromagnetism, Spiropulu suggested.

"We're very close into the energies where we can see effects of a very low-energy Planck scale," she said. "If an extra dimension is mirroring the Planck Scale, that means that gravity and the electromagnetic theory is going to be unified tomorrow."

Gravity, Spiropulu said, may soon be unified in an "unexplainable hierarchy of scale."

Various scenarios or "frameworks" are emerging to describe a mysterious sister world where, as Alice in Wonderland once remarked, "nothing would be what rings, because everything would be what it isn't."

Our three-dimensional world includes the coordinates X, Y, and Z, extending infinitely throughout the universe. But, some researchers have proposed that extra dimensions may be finite, and compacted around a sphere, pole, or other geometrical shape. Others have said that quarks, the standard-model particles, may have "technicolor" cousins in another realm. Or, quarks and neutrinos may exist in a mirror-world, as "squarks" and "sneutrinos."

To learn more about what's happening at the very small scale, Spiropulu and her colleagues are staging high-energy particle collisions. Extra dimensions, she explained, would leave behind a "signature," and she hopes to detect it. The classic signature might be a graviton -- the carrier of gravity -- capable, perhaps, of trickling to another dimension. In her experiments, protons (the hydrogen nucleus is a proton) going at almost the speed of light smash head-on into anti-protons. "What comes out," she said, "is a graviton, escaping into an extra dimension, and leaving a viable signature in your detector."

In particle collisions, the conservation of energy and momentum can be measured, so that what goes into the initial experiment must jive with what's left over, post crash-test. "If it doesn't add up and you have significant imbalance," she explained, "that is a viable signal that there is an extra dimension where, if these theories are valid, gravity may become very strong, and other weird properties might kick in. The idea is that there may be a form of super-gravity in the extra dimension."

Spiropulu shared the latest experimental findings at the AAAS meeting, including a completely new -- and what she described as "totally innovative strategy" -- worked out by Harvard's Nima Arkani-Hamed and others for "dynamically generating an extra dimension and then testing it," rather than the opposite, more conventional strategy: Searching for proof of an assumed extra dimension.

"We're looking at some really neat, new ideas," she concluded. "We hope by 2005 to have great results on this topic."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: palo verde
Thanks, Palo. I thought I'd be flamed out of cyberspace, but nobody seems to take much exception. I'm glad to know that someone else sees it the same way. Since all this came to me (or rather became clearer) in Canyonlands, maybe the desert areas of the west are affecting you and me. (I read your very interesting profile.) Good luck to you and your family! Love you too. --SB
81 posted on 02/19/2002 2:03:16 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
I think it is called schizophrenia. Think about it. Perhaps a schizophrenic is not ill, but not grounded in this reality.
82 posted on 02/19/2002 2:07:46 PM PST by chouli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Or “A new reality closer to ultimate truth.”

“And another one, even closer.”

“And another, closer still.”

“Ad infinitum.”

83 posted on 02/19/2002 2:09:22 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Is that what I'm saying? Now I'm confusing my own self. Well if I say so you must be right...or something like that.
84 posted on 02/19/2002 2:12:50 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: chouli
Oh, I think that's entirely possible. I had an old friend, a very lovely and beautiful girl, who became a severe schizophrenic. She could not communicate lucidly with anyone, including me. However, when we talked about deeply spiritual matters--God, angels, Jesus Christ--we could communicate, and it made sense to both of us. (Of course that could mean that I am also schizophrenic.)
85 posted on 02/19/2002 2:23:21 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
"It's Not my Dam Planet, Monkey Boy" (John BigBoote)

Brush with fame: I saw John Lithgow at Holiday Valley Skiing (just south of Buffalo) Just before "Third Rock.." became a big hit. Told Him Buckaroo Bonzai is one of my all-time faves and he laughed.

86 posted on 02/19/2002 2:31:00 PM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lafroste
Thanks for the ping.
87 posted on 02/19/2002 2:42:17 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Longshadow; Scully
ping! :)
88 posted on 02/19/2002 2:43:29 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Or “A new reality closer to ultimate truth.”

“And another one, even closer.”

“And another, closer still.”

“Ad infinitum.”

Isn't that why the "Creator" whoever he/she/it be gave us an inquisitive brain? Are we not fulfilling our destiny by raising such questions?

89 posted on 02/19/2002 2:49:53 PM PST by coolworx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
BTW Savage, have you ever read Desert Solitaire by Edward Abbey?
90 posted on 02/19/2002 2:52:50 PM PST by coolworx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
That follows from its being a spin-2 interaction. By symmetry, the dipole term vanishes in the multipole expansion. Gravitational waves propagate as a quadrupole undulation.

What is it that we observe about gravity that makes us say that it is a spin-2 interaction? Is it correct to assume it has nothing to do with multiple dimensions?

91 posted on 02/19/2002 3:25:08 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: coolworx
I haven't read Desert Solitaire, but when I saw your post I looked it up at Amazon.com. I read a little. It is beautiful. Should I read it? It was rated by readers almost a full five stars out of five.

It seems that in struggling to know we are struggling to fulfill our destiny. I think some would say that it is unity with God or to know God that is our ultimate longing.

I had wonderful experiences camping in the deserts but also many other places--the redwood forests, islands on the Georgia coast, India, Hawaii, Mount Shasta, Big Sur, et al. and in my own home. As Abbey said in the part of Desert Solitaire I just read, we all seem to have special places... The following lines are from an old Protestant hymn: “He speaks to me everywhere.” He speaks to all of us, everywhere, I think, all the time. His holy scripture is everywhere, and anyone can read it. At least, that's how it seems to me.

92 posted on 02/19/2002 3:54:57 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
As we move closer and closer to ultimate truth, we reach a point at which everything is paradoxical.I would think as we move closer to ultimate truth everything becomes less of a paradox and we eventually perceive existence free of dualities.

Beyond that...And all of this is happening at the same time, a spectrum of illusion -- or reality.

You've lost me here. ("Time" is an interesting word.) What would an existence beyond time look like? How could one conceive of such an existence, much less describe it?

Sorry for the delay in replying. (Work)

93 posted on 02/19/2002 6:01:47 PM PST by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: keri
To me, an existence free of duality is closer to truth than is paradox. I don't know that I can conceive of an existence without time, unless it is that time is an illusions and all events exist simultaneously, maybe like a CD or the tape of a movie, which can be played forward or backward but everything on it actually exists at the same time. What do you think?
94 posted on 02/19/2002 6:50:03 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
"A new reality above the corner"

That is an excellent point. Is the new dimension spacelike, or is it timelike, or is it something different altogether?

Is it possible if one moves in this new dimension that he can get to every time/space point in the universe immediately?

While they say the new dimension is very small, a millimeter or so, curved around somehow, it it possible if one were moving in this new dimension that it would seem infinite in length, although length would not be an appropriate description?

95 posted on 02/19/2002 7:27:17 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: henbane
some kind of synaptic connection

Could all our synapses be connected so that in fact we are one?

96 posted on 02/19/2002 7:29:54 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Big fleas have little fleas

Upon their backs to bite em

Those little fleas, still LESSER fleas!

And so ad infinitum.

97 posted on 02/19/2002 7:46:13 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
To me, an existence free of duality is closer to truth than is paradox. Me too.

...an existence without time, unless it is that time is an illusion and all events exist simultaneously, maybe like a CD or the tape of a movie, which can be played forward or backward but everything on it actually exists at the same time.

If time is an illusion and all events exist simultaneously, then we must also say that space is an illusion and "everything" (or nothing) exists exactly in one point. I don't see a way to separate time and space. How do we measure space? We measure it in units of time -- how long from point A to point B. If we dismiss time as illusion, however real it is, we must also dismiss space in the same manner.

What do you think? I think we are moving way beyond the topic -- into at least the metaphysical -- and I would like to be added to your ping list, if you have one.

98 posted on 02/19/2002 7:51:32 PM PST by keri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: anymouse
For "Is" and "Is-Not" though with Rule and Line,
And, "Up-and-Down" without, I could define,
I yet in all I only cared to know,
Was never deep in anything but—Wine.

——— Omar Khayyám (d.1123) tr. Edward Fitzgerald (1809-1883)

99 posted on 02/19/2002 7:54:13 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
But, what about the red leptons?

(whispers)

Lectroids - Red Lectroids ...

100 posted on 02/19/2002 7:59:29 PM PST by strela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson