To: wimpycat
Noting that anthrax mail stopped, I suspect the mailer had limited supply. That's about all I can guess.
3 posted on
02/19/2002 7:02:22 AM PST by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
That is my guess, and was my guess way back then. If they had a ton, I would not have anticipated anthrax mailings continuing for a longer period of time, however. I would have anticipated the batch of mailings they/she/he did to be much more widespread. All at once.
24 posted on
02/19/2002 7:22:47 AM PST by
Dales
To: 1Old Pro
Or he intended to frighten not kill. (The letters alerted the recipient that they contained anthrax and told to recipient to take antibiotics) In this case, someone who saw the deaths may have just stopped.
35 posted on
02/19/2002 7:39:27 AM PST by
ARCADIA
To: 1Old Pro
limited supply This is exactly the point that a number of us here on FR were making during the height of the scaremongering -- and we were flamed wildly because we weren't wearing enough tin foil to satisfy those who were proclaiming that the "end had come" or that "the terrorists were just waitng for further instructions, or waiting till we attacked Afghanistan, or waiting until Venus, Saturn and Jupiter aligned".
Of course the supply is limited -- how much of this stuff can you obtain at any price??? From the wild scaremongering that was going on you'd have thought these guys had a fleet of tanker trucks full of the stuff.
To: 1Old Pro
I suspect the mailer had limited supply...Of oxygen, one hopes.
To: 1Old Pro
It could be that the killer had a limited supply, and it also could be that he was taken out very quietly. I hope it is the latter he/she certainly didn't deserve any better, especially if they use to work for the government and held information the government didn't want known.
To: 1Old Pro
Noting that anthrax mail stopped, I suspect the mailer had limited supply. That's about all I can guess. Or they're busy mixing up a new batch.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson