(Snip one sentence.)
Bones are meaningless.
When you say there is no proof, you only mean that nothing can ever be proof of what you refuse to see.
No, I do not refuse to see. It is the evolutionists who refuse to see beyond their own noses. The bones are a very small part of a creature. In fact, genetically speaking, they show far less than 10% of the makeup of a creature. Therefore, one cannot say that a creature is the descendant of another with less than 10% of the evidence being available. What of the other 90%? For example, the distinctive characteristic of mammals, is that they have mammary glands. These are not present in the bones. How can one tell if the bones are of a mammal or not? The answer is one cannot. However evolutionists make that unjustified claim all the time when it is convenient for them.